Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

682 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

292 ms

worldwarwaterreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit worldwarwaterreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Worldwarwaterreview content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about worldwarwaterreview.com

Will World War Water Review work for you! Is World War Water Guide any Worth? What about side effects? Find out more in my honest customer program review

Visit worldwarwaterreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Worldwarwaterreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 682 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

worldwarwaterreview.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

worldwarwaterreview.com

682 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

119 ms

styles.css

139 ms

bootstrap.min.css

238 ms

font-awesome.min.css

165 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Worldwarwaterreview.com, 19% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (969 ms) belongs to the original domain Worldwarwaterreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.4 kB (39%)

Content Size

922.1 kB

After Optimization

562.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Worldwarwaterreview.com main page is 922.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 439.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 26.3 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 439.2 kB
  • After minification 427.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Worldwarwaterreview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 149.0 kB

  • Original 236.1 kB
  • After minification 233.3 kB
  • After compression 87.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 180.2 kB

  • Original 219.5 kB
  • After minification 206.6 kB
  • After compression 39.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Worldwarwaterreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 180.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Worldwarwaterreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

worldwarwaterreview.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Worldwarwaterreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Worldwarwaterreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Worldwarwaterreview. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: