6 sec in total
366 ms
4.2 sec
1.4 sec
Click here to check amazing Writedom content for Kenya. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about writedom.com
Do you want to make money by writing academic papers? Then you should visit WriteDom! Become part of our team and get the most of your freelance life!
Visit writedom.comWe analyzed Writedom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 366 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
writedom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value3.1 s
76/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value4,920 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.64
9/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
366 ms
81 ms
39 ms
165 ms
173 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Writedom.com, 57% (30 requests) were made to Static.express and 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Writedom.com.
Page size can be reduced by 41.0 kB (24%)
168.9 kB
127.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Writedom.com main page is 168.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 62.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.9 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Writedom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 95 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 117 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Writedom.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (29%)
42
30
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Writedom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
writedom.com
366 ms
css2
81 ms
front-view-bottom.css
39 ms
front-view-head.js
165 ms
email-decode.min.js
173 ms
front-view-bottom.js
3268 ms
lazysizes.min.5.1.0.js
416 ms
gtm.js
511 ms
menu-open.svg
357 ms
logo_main.svg
343 ms
hero_img.svg
302 ms
reviews_io_logo.svg
900 ms
star.svg
299 ms
star_half.svg
297 ms
trustpilot_logo.svg
365 ms
sitejabber_logo.svg
396 ms
expert1.svg
398 ms
expert2.svg
392 ms
benefits1.svg
601 ms
benefits2.svg
394 ms
benefits3.svg
508 ms
benefits4.svg
427 ms
benefits5.svg
506 ms
benefits6.svg
424 ms
process1.svg
504 ms
process2.svg
523 ms
process3.svg
528 ms
process4.svg
531 ms
earnings.svg
2208 ms
skillset_bg.svg
931 ms
review_avatar1.svg
600 ms
review_avatar4.svg
2284 ms
review_avatar2.svg
2280 ms
review_avatar5.svg
604 ms
review_avatar6.svg
670 ms
review_avatar3.svg
716 ms
wd-bottom-banner-bg-min.jpg
719 ms
watch.js
24 ms
front-view-slider.js
3350 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvKcPQ.woff
175 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jjPKcPQ.woff
181 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8j4PKcPQ.woff
354 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvKcPQ.woff
357 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jvvOcPQ.woff
458 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jYPWcPQ.woff
647 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jWfWcPQ.woff
279 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jPvWcPQ.woff
281 ms
7cH1v4okm5zmbvwkAx_sfcEuiD8jF_WcPQ.woff
314 ms
analytics.js
166 ms
collect
1463 ms
collect
57 ms
ga-audiences
71 ms
nr-1216.min.js
27 ms
writedom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
writedom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
writedom.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Writedom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Writedom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
writedom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Writedom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: