12.8 sec in total
936 ms
11.6 sec
277 ms
Click here to check amazing Wsisp content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wsisp.net
网硕互联成立于2008年,是老牌稳定的香港VPS服务器、香港站群服务器、香港服务器租用提供商,价格便宜质量高!自营香港Tier3+数据中心,自有中港三网CN2 GIA专线网络,7*24小时技术支持,数万用户的选择,欢迎免费试用!
Visit wsisp.netWe analyzed Wsisp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 936 ms and then it took 11.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
wsisp.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.7 s
17/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value960 ms
28/100
30%
Value0.425
22/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
936 ms
1617 ms
227 ms
450 ms
1269 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Wsisp.net, 54% (37 requests) were made to Wsisp.com and 17% (12 requests) were made to Webpage.qidian.qq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.6 sec) relates to the external source Wsisp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (43%)
2.5 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Wsisp.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.4 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.9 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 953.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Wsisp needs image optimization as it can save up to 953.0 kB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 15.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wsisp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)
57
27
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wsisp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wsisp.net
936 ms
www.wsisp.com
1617 ms
style.css
227 ms
responsive.css
450 ms
5ad69febe7ffe0bc747f2e5f13cb6876
1269 ms
logows-new.fw.png
1113 ms
ad25c29d23fc58eac7879097264b33d357eaf18313822-3sglFo_fw1200.png
7710 ms
687eb32929c5ed8c0dfaf4e86b06dd7ed4d636c027d596-bgDQfV.png
5208 ms
8ae936195ed951d9a31570ac37859a93fbabf32c9000f-jy5nWA_fw1200.png
8647 ms
user.png
727 ms
users.png
757 ms
gear.png
970 ms
cloud-up.png
1008 ms
care-support.png
1212 ms
home.png
1262 ms
earth.png
1335 ms
server.png
1955 ms
copy.js
1511 ms
jquery.1.11.3.min.js
1559 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2016 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1930 ms
waypoints.min.js
2008 ms
active.js
2231 ms
home-dsk-2.png
2519 ms
bootstrap.min.css
2221 ms
font-awesome.min.css
2256 ms
animate.min.css
2463 ms
fonts.css
2479 ms
icofont.css
2558 ms
owl.carousel.css
2705 ms
pk1.js
490 ms
i.js
10 ms
jsonp
666 ms
getGrayLevel
893 ms
wsisp-weixin.jpg
988 ms
common-theme-1.png
79 ms
trace
2932 ms
pc.html
494 ms
index.html
1209 ms
big-search.png
224 ms
big-dsk.png
243 ms
proximanova-regular.woff
255 ms
proximanova-semibold.woff
796 ms
icofont.ttf
5989 ms
proximanova-bold.woff
848 ms
proximanova-light.woff
849 ms
hm.js
1161 ms
trace
1399 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2916 ms
initQidianMonitor.js
8 ms
instant.js
10 ms
qidianMonitor.umd.min.js
45 ms
feedback-1.2.27.js
42 ms
trtc_4.14.4.js
143 ms
chunk-vendors.3a947e0a.css
35 ms
pc.7aff49b5.css
142 ms
chunk-imsdk.134bd0b5.js
37 ms
chunk-vendors.8a25d48b.js
165 ms
pc.a1c4c0bb.js
163 ms
collect
1438 ms
icomoon.f4992c50.ttf
105 ms
whitelist
957 ms
qidianMonitor.umd.min.js
15 ms
jquery-1.12.4-fixed.min.js
3 ms
statusManager.js
9 ms
amr.d8ebe3b6.js
36 ms
collect
993 ms
whitelist
925 ms
hm.gif
307 ms
wsisp.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
wsisp.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wsisp.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
ZH
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wsisp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Wsisp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wsisp.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wsisp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: