3.8 sec in total
521 ms
3.1 sec
100 ms
Welcome to xenical.com homepage info - get ready to check XENICAL best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about xenical.com
Visit xenical.comWe analyzed Xenical.com page load time and found that the first response time was 521 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xenical.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value4.6 s
71/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.324
35/100
15%
Value4.2 s
85/100
10%
521 ms
7 ms
94 ms
185 ms
464 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Xenical.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fast.fonts.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (671 ms) relates to the external source Gene.com.
Page size can be reduced by 362.1 kB (73%)
498.2 kB
136.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Xenical.com main page is 498.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 388.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 267.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xenical.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 86.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (69%)
29
9
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XENICAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
maintenance.jsp
521 ms
ga.js
7 ms
utils.js
94 ms
validate.js
185 ms
jquery-current.min.js
464 ms
swfobject.js
275 ms
site.js
186 ms
pde.js
190 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js
389 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
276 ms
topnav.js
283 ms
27f61167-9264-457b-9f5d-e102c0da5b27.css
52 ms
base.css
289 ms
tertiary.css
363 ms
pde.css
359 ms
rightcol.css
375 ms
basic.css
383 ms
advanced.css
489 ms
topnav.css
487 ms
navSideBaseRF.js
488 ms
oo_engine-2.js
489 ms
genecorp.js
503 ms
global-logo.gif
548 ms
btn-search.gif
549 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
collect
54 ms
bg-body-landing_nogreen.gif
90 ms
nav-divider.gif
89 ms
feedback.gif
87 ms
safari.css
671 ms
s75239791958592
39 ms
sIFR-print-page.css
103 ms
bg_pde_collapse.gif
671 ms
xenical.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
xenical.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
xenical.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xenical.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xenical.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xenical.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XENICAL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: