Tools & Wizards About Us
xescanner.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

xescanner.com

XE Scanner - Find and compare the best money changer exchange rates

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

274 ms

xescanner.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing XE Scanner content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xescanner.com

Find and compare the best money changer exchange rates.

Visit xescanner.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xescanner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xescanner.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,510 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.383

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xescanner.com

28 ms

xescanner.com

993 ms

currency-flags.min.css

569 ms

font-awesome.css

691 ms

ionicons.css

550 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Xescanner.com, 21% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Xescanner.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 266.9 kB (28%)

Content Size

948.0 kB

After Optimization

681.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xescanner.com main page is 948.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 466.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 135.2 kB

  • Original 146.5 kB
  • After minification 93.2 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 53.4 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 135.2 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 16.4 kB

  • Original 86.3 kB
  • After minification 69.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, XE Scanner needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.4 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 99.9 kB

  • Original 466.2 kB
  • After minification 466.2 kB
  • After compression 366.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 248.9 kB
  • After minification 246.9 kB
  • After compression 233.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xescanner.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (60%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XE Scanner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xescanner.com

xescanner.com

28 ms

xescanner.com

xescanner.com

993 ms

currency-flags.min.css

currency-flags.min.css

569 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

691 ms

ionicons.css

ionicons.css

550 ms

perfect-scrollbar.css

perfect-scrollbar.css

547 ms

jquery.switchButton.css

jquery.switchButton.css

545 ms

summernote-bs4.css

summernote-bs4.css

780 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

1073 ms

jquery.simplyscroll.css

jquery.simplyscroll.css

1090 ms

bracket.css

bracket.css

604 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

56 ms

js

js

95 ms

js

js

125 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

95 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1194 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

635 ms

popper.js

popper.js

650 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

1228 ms

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.js

perfect-scrollbar.jquery.js

1279 ms

moment.js

moment.js

1327 ms

jquery.switchButton.js

jquery.switchButton.js

1627 ms

jquery.peity.js

jquery.peity.js

1638 ms

summernote-bs4.min.js

summernote-bs4.min.js

1645 ms

bracket.js

bracket.js

1772 ms

tooltip-colored.js

tooltip-colored.js

1551 ms

popover-colored.js

popover-colored.js

1331 ms

bootstrap-select.min.js

bootstrap-select.min.js

1858 ms

js

js

45 ms

jquery.simplyscroll.min.js

jquery.simplyscroll.min.js

1838 ms

css

css

48 ms

css

css

66 ms

css

css

70 ms

css

css

70 ms

css

css

68 ms

css

css

69 ms

css

css

71 ms

roz-logo_thumbnail.PNG

roz-logo_thumbnail.PNG

1064 ms

logo_thumbnail.png

logo_thumbnail.png

1048 ms

logo_thumbnail.png

logo_thumbnail.png

1056 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1166 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1313 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1515 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1600 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1609 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1591 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1709 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

1843 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

2045 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

2137 ms

logo_thumbnail.png

logo_thumbnail.png

2132 ms

antara-logo_thumbnail.PNG

antara-logo_thumbnail.PNG

2154 ms

logo_thumbnail.png

logo_thumbnail.png

2250 ms

logo_thumbnail.png

logo_thumbnail.png

2356 ms

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

Taj%20LogoNew2_thumbnail.png

2573 ms

antara-logo_thumbnail.PNG

antara-logo_thumbnail.PNG

2409 ms

logo_thumbnail.png

logo_thumbnail.png

2412 ms

va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vvl4jO.ttf

va9E4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vvl4jO.ttf

103 ms

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnZKveRhf_.ttf

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnZKveRhf_.ttf

103 ms

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnPKreRhf_.ttf

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnPKreRhf_.ttf

102 ms

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnWKneRhf_.ttf

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnWKneRhf_.ttf

102 ms

va9C4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vn9LjJYTc.ttf

va9C4kDNxMZdWfMOD5Vn9LjJYTc.ttf

92 ms

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnSKzeRhf_.ttf

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnSKzeRhf_.ttf

102 ms

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eRhf_.ttf

va9B4kDNxMZdWfMOD5VnLK3eRhf_.ttf

105 ms

ionicons.ttf

ionicons.ttf

3384 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3194 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

103 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

102 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

102 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

103 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

104 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

104 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

105 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

130 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

130 ms

Accessibility Review

xescanner.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

xescanner.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

xescanner.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xescanner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xescanner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xescanner.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XE Scanner. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: