9.3 sec in total
479 ms
8.3 sec
501 ms
Visit xexwedding.com now to see the best up-to-date XEX Wedding content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xexwedding.com
レストランウエディング 東京 レストラン挙式「XEX」結婚式の二次会、パーティーに
Visit xexwedding.comWe analyzed Xexwedding.com page load time and found that the first response time was 479 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
xexwedding.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.36
30/100
15%
Value8.2 s
41/100
10%
479 ms
292 ms
294 ms
293 ms
296 ms
Our browser made a total of 121 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (114 requests) were addressed to the original Xexwedding.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Xexwedding.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.2 kB (15%)
1.7 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Xexwedding.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XEX Wedding images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 185.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.1 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xexwedding.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (37%)
119
75
The browser has sent 119 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XEX Wedding. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xexwedding.com
479 ms
system_DesignSettings.css
292 ms
system_SizeColorSettings2.css
294 ms
styles3.css
293 ms
import.css
296 ms
jquery.js
899 ms
cuisine.css
435 ms
jquery.min.js
80 ms
jquery-ui.js
110 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
584 ms
rollover2.js
583 ms
common.js
1023 ms
jquery.autoChange.js
589 ms
conversion.js
20 ms
reset.css
434 ms
common.css
584 ms
system_SizeColorSettings2.css
152 ms
ga.js
26 ms
loading.gif
148 ms
header_bg.png
294 ms
14h_01.jpg
294 ms
14h_02.jpg
296 ms
14h_03_rollout.jpg
301 ms
14h_04.jpg
438 ms
14h_05_rollout.jpg
445 ms
14h_06.jpg
584 ms
14h_07.jpg
585 ms
14h_08.jpg
593 ms
14h_09.jpg
591 ms
14h_10.jpg
729 ms
spacer.gif
736 ms
mainimage_bg.png
878 ms
sl1.jpg
2082 ms
sl2.jpg
2089 ms
sl3.jpg
2070 ms
sl4.jpg
2041 ms
sl5.jpg
2063 ms
bg14.gif
1177 ms
menu14_01.gif
1450 ms
menu14_02_rollout.gif
1741 ms
menu14_03_rollout.gif
2033 ms
menu14_04_rollout.gif
2313 ms
menu14_05_rollout.gif
2326 ms
menu14_06_rollout.gif
2336 ms
menu14_07_rollout.gif
2341 ms
menu14_08_rollout.gif
2352 ms
menu14_09.gif
2359 ms
menu14_10.gif
2604 ms
3men_01.jpg
2619 ms
3men_02.jpg
2771 ms
3men_03.jpg
2631 ms
3men_04.jpg
2787 ms
3men_05.jpg
2652 ms
__utm.gif
36 ms
42 ms
3men_06.jpg
2937 ms
3point_01.gif
2793 ms
82 ms
3point_02.gif
2655 ms
3point_03.gif
2676 ms
3point_04.gif
2801 ms
3point_05.gif
2805 ms
3point_06.gif
2794 ms
3point_07_01.png
2794 ms
3point_10_02.png
2678 ms
3point_07_03.png
2787 ms
3point_08.gif
2798 ms
3point_09.gif
2812 ms
3point_10_01.png
2793 ms
3point_10_04.png
2798 ms
3point_10_05.png
2676 ms
3point_11.gif
2485 ms
3point_12.gif
2214 ms
3point_13_01.png
1934 ms
3point_13_02.png
1780 ms
3point_13_04.png
1772 ms
3point_13_05.png
1790 ms
3point_14.gif
1885 ms
3point_15.gif
1898 ms
sorezore.gif
1898 ms
atago.jpg
2215 ms
daikanyama.jpg
2211 ms
tokyo.jpg
2225 ms
nihonbashi.jpg
2323 ms
west.jpg
2336 ms
omotesando.jpg
2190 ms
nagatachou.jpg
2506 ms
news_01.gif
2210 ms
news_02.gif
2217 ms
p1.gif
2206 ms
news_04.gif
2184 ms
news_05.gif
2191 ms
news_07.gif
2211 ms
news_09.gif
2218 ms
news_11.gif
2205 ms
news_13.gif
2194 ms
xb.png
3076 ms
slond.png
2467 ms
otb_02.png
2211 ms
otb_04.png
2218 ms
otb_05.png
2205 ms
otb_06.png
2194 ms
otb_07.png
2346 ms
map.png
2642 ms
bbs.gif
2389 ms
ft2.gif
2323 ms
totoi2.gif
2310 ms
dkgkfhdkfhsdk2.gif
2362 ms
btn_pagetop.png
2472 ms
footer_copyright.png
2468 ms
rpoint.gif
2385 ms
footer_bg.png
2494 ms
14h_03_rollover.jpg
147 ms
14h_05_rollover.jpg
151 ms
menu14_02_rollover.gif
293 ms
menu14_03_rollover.gif
294 ms
menu14_04_rollover.gif
293 ms
menu14_05_rollover.gif
302 ms
menu14_06_rollover.gif
436 ms
menu14_07_rollover.gif
449 ms
menu14_08_rollover.gif
584 ms
xexwedding.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xexwedding.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
xexwedding.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xexwedding.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xexwedding.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xexwedding.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XEX Wedding. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: