2.7 sec in total
382 ms
2 sec
303 ms
Visit xfont.ru now to see the best up-to-date XFont content for Kazakhstan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xfont.ru
Только у нас вы можете БЕСПЛАТНО скачать ШРИФТЫ, русские шрифты, шрифты для фотошопа, windows шрифты и для word'a!
Visit xfont.ruWe analyzed Xfont.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 382 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
xfont.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value1,710 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.281
43/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
382 ms
544 ms
193 ms
194 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Xfont.ru, 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (544 ms) belongs to the original domain Xfont.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 182.4 kB (59%)
308.6 kB
126.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Xfont.ru main page is 308.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 166.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XFont images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 99.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.3 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xfont.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (73%)
70
19
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XFont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xfont.ru
382 ms
www.xfont.ru
544 ms
system.base.css
193 ms
system.menus.css
194 ms
system.messages.css
194 ms
system.theme.css
196 ms
comment.css
194 ms
field.css
195 ms
node.css
287 ms
search.css
287 ms
user.css
286 ms
forum.css
288 ms
views.css
287 ms
ckeditor.css
290 ms
ctools.css
380 ms
all.css
380 ms
jquery.js
474 ms
jquery.once.js
385 ms
drupal.js
385 ms
ru_GBn40mcqKavHNcqj-N_pcJPN36AFBpc7rxIasqPiadI.js
386 ms
xfont.js
472 ms
adsbygoogle.js
12 ms
logo
258 ms
5429205.ttf.png
120 ms
4428606.ttf.png
115 ms
4428658.ttf.png
116 ms
8428523.ttf.png
116 ms
2428649.ttf.png
119 ms
9429377.ttf.png
191 ms
9428579.ttf.png
193 ms
6428534.ttf.png
212 ms
4428541.ttf.png
211 ms
3427679.ttf.png
221 ms
37555.ttf.png
222 ms
2128077.ttf.png
278 ms
76133.ttf.png
278 ms
9196334.ttf.png
285 ms
6273402.ttf.png
287 ms
analytics.js
62 ms
main.gif
294 ms
ca-pub-9698355760409128.js
77 ms
zrt_lookup.html
73 ms
show_ads_impl.js
73 ms
sep07.gif
240 ms
sep05.gif
304 ms
btn05.gif
302 ms
nav.gif
311 ms
ico-plus.gif
316 ms
sidebar-block.gif
332 ms
side-head.gif
347 ms
arrow03.gif
391 ms
side-box.gif
393 ms
login-form.gif
412 ms
btn-enter.gif
434 ms
collect
85 ms
menu-leaf.png
401 ms
watch.js
4 ms
ads
248 ms
osd.js
24 ms
3213713.ttf.png
326 ms
996356.ttf.png
365 ms
1159044.ttf.png
367 ms
7195319.ttf.png
379 ms
hit
266 ms
collect
61 ms
ads
196 ms
ga-audiences
69 ms
9773245903966784904
54 ms
abg.js
59 ms
m_js_controller.js
70 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
50 ms
hit
135 ms
s
23 ms
x_button_blue2.png
24 ms
9aKOW9kHIBrJTB9ONj-e1oyTZuOGlgCE-J5p-KupNmo.js
6 ms
collect
5 ms
ui
17 ms
xfont.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
xfont.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xfont.ru SEO score
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xfont.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xfont.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xfont.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XFont. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: