Tools & Wizards About Us
xfont.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

xfont.ru

Бесплатно скачать шрифты | XFont.Ru

Page Load Speed

3 sec in total

First Response

332 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

206 ms

xfont.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit xfont.ru now to see the best up-to-date XFont content for Kazakhstan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xfont.ru

Только у нас вы можете БЕСПЛАТНО скачать ШРИФТЫ, русские шрифты, шрифты для фотошопа, windows шрифты и для word'a!

Visit xfont.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Xfont.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 332 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xfont.ru performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.0 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.252

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.5 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xfont.ru

332 ms

www.xfont.ru

350 ms

www.xfont.ru

519 ms

system.base.css

97 ms

system.menus.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Xfont.ru, 5% (3 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (581 ms) belongs to the original domain Xfont.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.1 kB (36%)

Content Size

246.9 kB

After Optimization

158.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xfont.ru main page is 246.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 156.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

  • Original 56.6 kB
  • After minification 50.9 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 18.3 kB
  • After minification 16.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XFont images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 156.3 kB
  • After minification 155.5 kB
  • After compression 118.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.6 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 15.7 kB
  • After minification 14.1 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xfont.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (72%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XFont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xfont.ru

xfont.ru

332 ms

www.xfont.ru

www.xfont.ru

350 ms

www.xfont.ru

www.xfont.ru

519 ms

system.base.css

system.base.css

97 ms

system.menus.css

system.menus.css

193 ms

system.messages.css

system.messages.css

287 ms

system.theme.css

system.theme.css

288 ms

comment.css

comment.css

288 ms

field.css

field.css

288 ms

node.css

node.css

288 ms

search.css

search.css

289 ms

user.css

user.css

383 ms

forum.css

forum.css

382 ms

views.css

views.css

383 ms

ckeditor.css

ckeditor.css

383 ms

ctools.css

ctools.css

384 ms

all.css

all.css

386 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

581 ms

jquery.once.js

jquery.once.js

486 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

487 ms

ru_GBn40mcqKavHNcqj-N_pcJPN36AFBpc7rxIasqPiadI.js

ru_GBn40mcqKavHNcqj-N_pcJPN36AFBpc7rxIasqPiadI.js

488 ms

xfont.js

xfont.js

487 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

106 ms

ajax-get-content.php

ajax-get-content.php

104 ms

logo

logo

502 ms

5429205.ttf.png

5429205.ttf.png

100 ms

4428606.ttf.png

4428606.ttf.png

101 ms

4428658.ttf.png

4428658.ttf.png

101 ms

8428523.ttf.png

8428523.ttf.png

101 ms

2428649.ttf.png

2428649.ttf.png

101 ms

9429377.ttf.png

9429377.ttf.png

229 ms

9428579.ttf.png

9428579.ttf.png

229 ms

6428534.ttf.png

6428534.ttf.png

229 ms

4428541.ttf.png

4428541.ttf.png

230 ms

3427679.ttf.png

3427679.ttf.png

229 ms

941995.ttf.png

941995.ttf.png

230 ms

786733.ttf.png

786733.ttf.png

287 ms

3252164.ttf.png

3252164.ttf.png

287 ms

7232422.ttf.png

7232422.ttf.png

288 ms

985281.ttf.png

985281.ttf.png

289 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

55 ms

main.gif

main.gif

279 ms

sep07.gif

sep07.gif

233 ms

sep05.gif

sep05.gif

325 ms

btn05.gif

btn05.gif

326 ms

nav.gif

nav.gif

326 ms

ico-plus.gif

ico-plus.gif

327 ms

sidebar-block.gif

sidebar-block.gif

328 ms

side-head.gif

side-head.gif

327 ms

arrow03.gif

arrow03.gif

420 ms

side-box.gif

side-box.gif

421 ms

login-form.gif

login-form.gif

422 ms

btn-enter.gif

btn-enter.gif

421 ms

collect

collect

20 ms

menu-leaf.png

menu-leaf.png

390 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

283892.ttf.png

283892.ttf.png

383 ms

hit

hit

492 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

js

js

56 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

94 ms

hit

hit

128 ms

Accessibility Review

xfont.ru accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

xfont.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xfont.ru SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xfont.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xfont.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xfont.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XFont. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: