5.6 sec in total
469 ms
4.4 sec
744 ms
Visit xhtml.ru now to see the best up-to-date X Html content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xhtml.ru
XHTML — EXtensible HyperText Markup Language, расширяемый язык разметки гипертекста
Visit xhtml.ruWe analyzed Xhtml.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 469 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
xhtml.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value3.2 s
74/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value2,910 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.14
78/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
469 ms
1156 ms
131 ms
253 ms
364 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Xhtml.ru, 8% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Xhtml.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 357.1 kB (24%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Xhtml.ru main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 874.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 117.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, X Html needs image optimization as it can save up to 117.7 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 115.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 115.8 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xhtml.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (67%)
90
30
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of X Html. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xhtml.ru
469 ms
xhtml.ru
1156 ms
style.min.css
131 ms
styles.css
253 ms
postratings-css.css
364 ms
style.css
376 ms
browser-supports.css
374 ms
icon
60 ms
css2
76 ms
front.min.css
372 ms
addtoany.min.css
378 ms
pwaforwp-main.min.css
378 ms
page.js
61 ms
jquery.min.js
608 ms
addtoany.min.js
494 ms
front.min.js
495 ms
cse.js
71 ms
xhtml-components.js
813 ms
js
89 ms
default.min.css
44 ms
highlight.min.js
50 ms
index.js
493 ms
index.js
493 ms
postratings-js.js
652 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
652 ms
masonry.min.js
654 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
652 ms
theme.js
803 ms
api.js
63 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
802 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
801 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
800 ms
index.js
808 ms
pwaforwp-video.js
937 ms
pwaforwp-download.js
936 ms
eso.BRQnzO8v.js
18 ms
adsbygoogle.js
327 ms
xhtml_ru_logo_512-1.png
528 ms
rating_on.gif
325 ms
rating_half.gif
325 ms
rating_off.gif
534 ms
loading.gif
533 ms
download-file.png
686 ms
has-case-12.png
699 ms
styling-scrollbars.png
533 ms
screen-sharing-record.png
686 ms
tree-views.png
611 ms
3-cols-layout-1-300x246.png
610 ms
line-up-1-300x199.png
610 ms
pancake-stack-1-300x228.png
702 ms
deconstructed-pancake-1-276x300.png
702 ms
repeat-auto-minmax-1-300x213.png
703 ms
sidebar-1-300x151.png
805 ms
super-centered-1.png
808 ms
12-span-grid-1-300x100.png
832 ms
Clipp-iOs-1-300x206.png
833 ms
hover_and_pointer_media_query-1-300x278.png
835 ms
jumping-labels-for-text-input-1.png
834 ms
multiple-box-shadow-1.png
924 ms
at-property-1.png
899 ms
animated-gradient-border-1-300x300.png
911 ms
ar-16-9-1.png
913 ms
telegram.svg
913 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79P0U.ttf
157 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh4Ok.ttf
160 ms
twitter.svg
913 ms
cse_element__ru.js
48 ms
default+ru.css
48 ms
minimalist.css
46 ms
flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNZ.ttf
116 ms
tag.js
973 ms
code.js
878 ms
top100.js
806 ms
rating_over.gif
861 ms
recaptcha__en.js
85 ms
js
200 ms
analytics.js
194 ms
sm.25.html
92 ms
icons.38.svg.js
66 ms
async-ads.js
61 ms
clear.png
50 ms
anchor
123 ms
collect
88 ms
styles__ltr.css
19 ms
recaptcha__en.js
22 ms
Dahk90Fxhr1MEtfyZ-6_j6N-qVuiwfy-NjSFsUln5nQ.js
35 ms
webworker.js
66 ms
logo_48.png
21 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
28 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
29 ms
recaptcha__en.js
28 ms
sync-loader.js
971 ms
counter
141 ms
dyn-goal-config.js
277 ms
advert.gif
691 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
141 ms
tracker
140 ms
xhtml.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
xhtml.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
xhtml.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xhtml.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xhtml.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xhtml.ru
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of X Html. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: