10 sec in total
750 ms
8.2 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to xicom.us homepage info - get ready to check Xicom best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about xicom.us
Visit xicom.usWe analyzed Xicom.us page load time and found that the first response time was 750 ms and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
xicom.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
750 ms
1984 ms
987 ms
736 ms
499 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xicom.us, 95% (41 requests) were made to Xicomtechnologies.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Xicomtechnologies.com.
Page size can be reduced by 471.9 kB (12%)
4.0 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Xicom.us main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xicom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.0 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 242.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xicom.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 242.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)
37
25
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xicom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xicom.us
750 ms
www.xicomtechnologies.com
1984 ms
bootstrap.min.css
987 ms
style.css
736 ms
reset.css
499 ms
css
26 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
493 ms
style-fonts.css
1007 ms
jquery.min.js
1280 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1026 ms
responsive.css
749 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
982 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.min.js
760 ms
jquery.page-scroller-navs.js
986 ms
scripts.js
1013 ms
jquery.classyloader.js
1011 ms
logo-white3.png
257 ms
slide-1.jpg
1713 ms
slide-2.jpg
2737 ms
slide-3.jpg
1706 ms
services.jpg
2455 ms
parallax-bg-work1.jpg
2547 ms
portfolio1.png
2054 ms
portfolio2.png
2437 ms
portfolio4.png
2448 ms
portfolio3.png
2812 ms
portfolio5.png
2924 ms
portfolio6.png
2943 ms
portfolio7.png
2945 ms
portfolio8.png
3055 ms
geometric-bg.jpg
2986 ms
home-logo.png
3063 ms
1.png
3170 ms
design.png
3188 ms
develop.png
3190 ms
deploy.png
3236 ms
bg.jpg
3309 ms
confirmation.png
3315 ms
dinpro-medium_13936.woff
3348 ms
gt-pressura-bold.woff
3373 ms
dinpro-bold_13934.woff
3373 ms
infinitefont.woff
3919 ms
bx_loader.gif
254 ms
xicom.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
xicom.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
xicom.us SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xicom.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Xicom.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xicom.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xicom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: