Tools & Wizards About Us
xingxing.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

xingxing.us

爱星盘_国内领先、专业、好用

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

874 ms

Resources Loaded

6.9 sec

Page Rendered

557 ms

xingxing.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xingxing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xingxing.us

爱星盘，国内领先、专业、好用

Visit xingxing.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Xingxing.us page load time and found that the first response time was 874 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xingxing.us performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.0 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xingxing.us

874 ms

animate-2.css

630 ms

flaticon.css

420 ms

icon.css

420 ms

flags.css

627 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Xingxing.us, 32% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) belongs to the original domain Xingxing.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (49%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Xingxing.us main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 986.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 20.1 kB

  • Original 24.0 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.1 kB, which is 42% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 986.6 kB
  • After minification 972.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xingxing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 604.9 kB

  • Original 769.9 kB
  • After minification 609.8 kB
  • After compression 165.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 604.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 507.8 kB

  • Original 579.7 kB
  • After minification 579.6 kB
  • After compression 71.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xingxing.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 507.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (58%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xingxing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

xingxing.us

xingxing.us

874 ms

animate-2.css

animate-2.css

630 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

420 ms

icon.css

icon.css

420 ms

flags.css

flags.css

627 ms

odometer.min.css

odometer.min.css

421 ms

slick.css

slick.css

422 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1245 ms

style.css

style.css

1660 ms

spinner.gif

spinner.gif

1045 ms

logo.png

logo.png

838 ms

banner-img.png

banner-img.png

1039 ms

banner-vector-1.png

banner-vector-1.png

837 ms

banner-vector-2.png

banner-vector-2.png

1047 ms

about-img.png

about-img.png

5485 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

1250 ms

jquery.flagstrap.min.js

jquery.flagstrap.min.js

1049 ms

jquery.appear.min.js

jquery.appear.min.js

1052 ms

odometer.min.js

odometer.min.js

1246 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

4014 ms

owl.carousel2.thumbs.min.js

owl.carousel2.thumbs.min.js

2547 ms

jquery-modal-video.min.js

jquery-modal-video.min.js

1453 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1469 ms

progresscircle.js

progresscircle.js

1667 ms

simple-rating.js

simple-rating.js

1667 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

3114 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

3543 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

6028 ms

main.js

main.js

2965 ms

brand-1.png

brand-1.png

3174 ms

brand-2.png

brand-2.png

3321 ms

brand-3.png

brand-3.png

3384 ms

brand-4.png

brand-4.png

3529 ms

brand-5.png

brand-5.png

3594 ms

css2

css2

36 ms

banner-bg.jpg

banner-bg.jpg

2222 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

2443 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJDUdVNF.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJDUdVNF.ttf

30 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1tvEv-L.ttf

36 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1tvEv-L.ttf

37 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1tvEv-L.ttf

36 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTed3FHGPc.ttf

36 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1tvEv-L.ttf

36 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1tvEv-L.ttf

97 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1tvEv-L.ttf

98 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1tvEv-L.ttf

97 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLed3FHGPc.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLed3FHGPc.ttf

152 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEN2JQEk.ttf

98 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEN2JQEk.ttf

152 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEN2JQEk.ttf

99 ms

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tFOvWDSA.ttf

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tFOvWDSA.ttf

98 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEN2JQEk.ttf

153 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEN2JQEk.ttf

153 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEN2JQEk.ttf

154 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEN2JQEk.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEN2JQEk.ttf

153 ms

flaticon.ttf

flaticon.ttf

2154 ms

Accessibility Review

xingxing.us accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

xingxing.us best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xingxing.us SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xingxing.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Xingxing.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xingxing.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xingxing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: