3.3 sec in total
263 ms
2.7 sec
369 ms
Click here to check amazing Xintec content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xintec.com
Xintec help grow your business by protecting you with our Revenue Assurance & Fraud Management Solutions for Telecom
Visit xintec.comWe analyzed Xintec.com page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xintec.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value2,300 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.027
100/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
263 ms
568 ms
69 ms
30 ms
42 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Xintec.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Xintec.com.
Page size can be reduced by 648.7 kB (32%)
2.0 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Xintec.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xintec images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 307.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 307.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 272.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xintec.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (33%)
67
45
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xintec. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xintec.com
263 ms
www.xintec.com
568 ms
68705.js
69 ms
css
30 ms
css
42 ms
bootstrap.min.css
207 ms
font-awesome.min.css
152 ms
prettyPhoto.css
142 ms
animate.css
135 ms
font-awesome.min.css
16 ms
main.css
143 ms
mobile.css
152 ms
jquery.js
338 ms
api.js
41 ms
bootstrap.min.js
152 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
151 ms
main.js
152 ms
css
14 ms
css
26 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
117 ms
bootstrap.min.js
112 ms
main.js
127 ms
analytics.js
79 ms
iStock_000025118261Large_1289x550.jpg
447 ms
header-bg-b.jpg
285 ms
XINTEC_logo_300x100.jpg
130 ms
iStock_000015601545Large_1289x550.jpg
334 ms
banner1d.jpg
520 ms
play_logo_156x60.png
164 ms
ventelo_156x60.jpg
166 ms
Vodafone_logo_svg_156x60.png
285 ms
Tango_logo_69x60.jpg
285 ms
Virgin_Mobile_logo_156x60.jpg
289 ms
449px_KPN_logo.svg_156x60.png
417 ms
solomon_telekom_156x60.gif
418 ms
syniverse_logo_156x60.png
419 ms
orange_logo_156x60.png
420 ms
nrj_logo_156x60.jpg
463 ms
TCI_logo_156x60.png
540 ms
y_gsm_156x60.png
542 ms
Optus_logo_156x60.png
545 ms
etisalat_69x60.png
547 ms
Andorra_logo_156x60.jpg
588 ms
Comfone_logo_156x60.jpg
643 ms
globaltelecom_156x60.png
664 ms
2_Degrees_logo_156x60.jpg
667 ms
telecom_fiji_156x60.jpg
669 ms
Digicel_flag__89x80.jpg
671 ms
Fraudstrike_Logo_dark_1.jpg
899 ms
new_york_14480_640_338x130.jpg
766 ms
aircraft_505126_1280_338x130.jpg
787 ms
new_york_14480_640_1191x130.jpg
1052 ms
TCI_logo_104x80.png
856 ms
vodafone_logo_118x80.png
805 ms
2_Degrees_logo_190x80.jpg
892 ms
solomon_telekom_260x100.gif
912 ms
banner2_Copy_1289x566.jpg
1126 ms
youtube_1_36x36.png
988 ms
linkedin_2_36x36.png
1016 ms
recaptcha__en.js
123 ms
twitter_3_36x36.png
967 ms
piwik.js
334 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
34 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1076 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
35 ms
collect
23 ms
anchor
28 ms
Fraudstrike_Logo_253x106.png
1020 ms
collect
84 ms
styles__ltr.css
8 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
25 ms
webworker.js
57 ms
logo_48.png
23 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
57 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
63 ms
recaptcha__en.js
7 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
228 ms
xintec.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
xintec.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xintec.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xintec.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xintec.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xintec.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Xintec. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: