983 ms in total
167 ms
661 ms
155 ms
Visit xmlforasp.net now to see the best up-to-date XML Forasp content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xmlforasp.net
For Focused .NET/XML and Web Services Training Visit the XML for ASP.NET Developers Website: http://www.xmlforasp.net
Visit xmlforasp.netWe analyzed Xmlforasp.net page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 816 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
xmlforasp.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value3.6 s
59/100
25%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.542
13/100
15%
Value3.6 s
92/100
10%
167 ms
46 ms
57 ms
38 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Xmlforasp.net, 10% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (255 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 57.7 kB (35%)
166.0 kB
108.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Xmlforasp.net main page is 166.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 107.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, XML Forasp needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.0 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xmlforasp.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (34%)
41
27
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XML Forasp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
xmlforasp.net
167 ms
scripts.js
46 ms
style.css
57 ms
WebResource.axd
38 ms
WebResource.axd
58 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
headerLeft.jpg
41 ms
headerRight.jpg
44 ms
navLeftPixel.gif
38 ms
black_bullet.gif
39 ms
pow_by_orcsweb.gif
44 ms
aspnetPROMag_100x30.gif
44 ms
poweredbyaspnet.gif
44 ms
123aspx_100X30.gif
51 ms
xmlspyPartner.gif
55 ms
slackersAd.button.gif
66 ms
componentone.jpg
134 ms
headerFill.gif
54 ms
navBackgroundPixel.gif
48 ms
film.gif
60 ms
NewsletterSmall.png
120 ms
bulletXML.gif
65 ms
books_XMLforASP.NET.jpg
121 ms
books_MVPHacks.jpg
121 ms
books_ASP.NETInsiderSolutions.jpg
122 ms
books_ASP.NETUnleashed.jpg
121 ms
books_ASP.NETTips.jpg
122 ms
LogoSmall.jpg
122 ms
book_small.gif
215 ms
xbox.jpg
122 ms
ca-pub-4350434074530482.js
126 ms
zrt_lookup.html
22 ms
show_ads_impl.js
50 ms
ads
255 ms
osd.js
7 ms
m_js_controller.js
19 ms
abg.js
30 ms
favicon
45 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
47 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
21 ms
s
12 ms
x_button_blue2.svg
4 ms
xmlforasp.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
xmlforasp.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
xmlforasp.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xmlforasp.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Xmlforasp.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
xmlforasp.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of XML Forasp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: