Analyze

xmresults.in: Exam Results - Check All India Results | No 1 Result Portal

Check All India Results | No 1 Result Portal

Page load speed analysis

  • 47/100

    Normal result
  • 5

    Successful tests
  • 3

    Failed tests
  • First response

    2.9 sec

  • Resources loaded

    6.3 sec

  • Page rendered

    311 ms

  • Total page load time

    9.5 sec

Visit xmresults.in now to see the best up-to-date Xm Results content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about xmresults.in

We analyzed Xmresults.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Page optimization

  • HTML 165.8 kB
    Images 33.8 kB
    Javascripts 1.4 MB
    CSS 82.5 kB

    In fact, the total size of Xmresults.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

    • Original 165.8 kB
    • After minification 163.9 kB
    • After compression 25.5 kB

    HTML optimization

    HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

    • Original 33.8 kB
    • After optimization 28.2 kB

    Image optimization

    Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Xm Results needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

    • Original 1.4 MB
    • After minification 1.4 MB
    • After compression 450.7 kB

    JavaScript optimization

    It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 992.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

    • Original 82.5 kB
    • After minification 72.6 kB
    • After compression 25.8 kB

    CSS optimization

    CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xmresults.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

Network requests diagram

  • xmresults.in
  • wp-emoji-release.min.js
  • fab_style.css
  • style.css
  • screen.min.css
  • css
  • genericons.css
  • style.css
  • responsive.css
  • jquery.js
  • jquery-migrate.min.js
  • buttons.js
  • adsbygoogle.js
  • front.min.js
  • wp-embed.min.js
  • async-buttons.js
  • pview
  • honeycomb.png
  • sc
  • ca-pub-8296971920359721.js
  • zrt_lookup.html
  • show_ads_impl.js
  • Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsDR-eWpsHSw83BRsAQElGgc.ttf
  • b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDokq8qT6AIiNJ07Vf_NrVA.ttf
  • Genericons.svg
  • 8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
  • BkZwJXYnumPMepfEA344yQ.ttf
  • eFfAHNfFT0YtF77QmRKRj_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
  • buttons.e80452d5e7cc382dad89d10f50bde247.css
  • get_counts
  • sdk.js
  • plusone.js
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • get_counts
  • p.js
  • js15.js
  • bubble_arrow_below.png
  • facebook_counter.png
  • twitter_counter.png
  • linkedin_counter.png
  • email_counter.png
  • sharethis_counter.png
  • pinterest_counter.png
  • ads
  • osd.js
  • t.dhj
  • 0sTQzbapM8j.js
  • 0sTQzbapM8j.js
  • t.dhj
  • t_.js
  • cb=gapi.loaded_0
  • cb=gapi.loaded_1
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • fastbutton
  • 0.php
  • generic
  • postmessageRelay
  • rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA
  • ads
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • like.php
  • page.php
  • generic
  • pixel
  • generic
  • tpid=CvQHA1mvwYUAAAARKoNMAw%3D%3D
  • ttd
  • 971028622-postmessagerelay.js
  • rpc:shindig_random.js
  • cs
  • 50962
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • lH1ibRl5GKq.png
  • nlsn
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • cs
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • VMo7O5e5aMO.css
  • BWRIL9-XbYW.js
  • JrFVMrRpAYB.js
  • iFBP3Ltwel2.js
  • 2e4nmgzajeT.js
  • xHQWNuU6NG7.js
  • I0twv5cR4Lp.js
  • S9jMCKT8oc5.js
  • T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
  • generic
  • Iv-bqISgsE7.js
  • cb=gapi.loaded_0
  • tpid=1FE7044586C1AF59605FA753028809CC
  • 27675
  • ZQp6LCe0OO3LeZB6ES1CZrJvMefQTtT9oZjddBS5
  • 5386
  • 14238328_318007348548235_3723210794242138217_n.jpg
  • 12033087_141329742882664_3761444887736692636_n.jpg
  • wMkwmq5_RAN.png
  • b53Ajb4ihCP.gif
  • kitten
  • events
  • index.37b4b85c83ff6e0b734bb117f0024eb0.html
  • stcommon.0128627f929f0b889d3ed3a92817130e.js
  • st.a5142d7623949e27681f588633849ba8.js
  • dduid_sync

Our browser made a total of 138 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Xmresults.in, 16% (22 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 12% (16 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Xmresults.in.

Additional info on xmresults.in

Requests

The browser has sent 125 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xm Results. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

46

Javascripts

25

Images

9

CSS

45

AJAX

125

All

Possible request optimization

1

Javascripts

12

Images

1

CSS

45

AJAX

66

Optimized

59

All

Normal result

IP address

This IP address is dedicated to Xmresults.in. This is the best domain hosting practice .

Good result

IP Trace

DNS records

Type Host Target/ip TTL Other
A

xmresults.in

203.124.120.70 14399
NS

xmresults.in

ns2.joinforcareer.com 21599
NS

xmresults.in

ns1.joinforcareer.com 21599
SOA

xmresults.in

21599 Mname: ns1.joinforcareer.com
Rname: jitendradhaka143.gmail.com
Serial: 2017020400
Refresh: 86400
Retry: 7200
Expire: 3600000
Minimum-ttl: 86400
MX

xmresults.in

xmresults.in 14399 Pri: 0

Language and encoding

Good result

Language

EN en language flag

Detected

EN en language flag

Claimed

Encoding

UTF-8

Claimed

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xmresults.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xmresults.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

HTTPS certificate

SSL Certificate

Xmresults.in has no SSL certificate. Web browsing can be safer with HTTPS connection, so we suggest that it should be obtained for this site.

Poor result

Visitor World Map

Country of origin for 82.1% of all visits is India. Unfortunately, we cannot track the location of Xmresults.in server and thus cannot define if the distance between their user base and server can potentially affect the page load time

Good result

Poor result

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xm Results. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

xmresults.in

Share this report in social media

Analyze another website

Analyze