3 sec in total
114 ms
2.5 sec
460 ms
Welcome to xnet.net homepage info - get ready to check XNet best content right away, or after learning these important things about xnet.net
Chicago area data center specializing in high-performance cloud services, colocation services, website and application hosting, and dedicated connectivity.
Visit xnet.netWe analyzed Xnet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 114 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xnet.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value240 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.248
50/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
114 ms
819 ms
23 ms
46 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xnet.net, 72% (44 requests) were made to Xnet.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Xnet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 88.7 kB (5%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Xnet.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XNet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.9 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xnet.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)
50
14
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XNet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xnet.net
114 ms
www.xnet.com
819 ms
normalize.css
23 ms
ie8.css
46 ms
55 ms
css
20 ms
663 ms
icondemo.js
49 ms
excanvas.js
51 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
75 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
66 ms
jquerytransit.js
73 ms
css
21 ms
1378 ms
css
20 ms
css
18 ms
css
29 ms
css
21 ms
fonts.css
26 ms
font-awesome.css
35 ms
icomoon-fonts.css
44 ms
jupiter-icons.css
48 ms
theme-styles.css
112 ms
responsive-theme.css
72 ms
contact-us.png
36 ms
about-bg.png
38 ms
blog.png
38 ms
cutomer-support.png
36 ms
data-center.png
36 ms
why-xnet.png
62 ms
service.png
65 ms
our-customer.png
65 ms
resources.png
66 ms
xnet-logo2.png
67 ms
red-xnet1.jpg
89 ms
withxnet1.jpg
116 ms
high-performance.png
90 ms
intense-customisation.png
91 ms
high-touch.png
91 ms
dont-hiren.png
115 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
25 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
27 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
29 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
108 ms
text-big-bg11.jpg
182 ms
text-big-bg2new.jpg
271 ms
txt-bg-new-nnn.jpg
216 ms
sep-bg.png
54 ms
call-ico.png
66 ms
email-us.png
86 ms
business-hours.png
86 ms
ga.js
13 ms
slddbg62.jpg
158 ms
raxjHiqOu8IVPmn7epZnDMyKBvHf5D6c4Pz-X3B0.woff
39 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLjOWw.woff
37 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWw.woff
38 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
skin.css
25 ms
style.css
25 ms
xnet.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xnet.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xnet.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xnet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xnet.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
xnet.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XNet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: