3.3 sec in total
166 ms
2.4 sec
727 ms
Welcome to xnet.net homepage info - get ready to check XNet best content right away, or after learning these important things about xnet.net
Chicago area data center specializing in high-performance cloud services, colocation services, website and application hosting, and dedicated connectivity.
Visit xnet.netWe analyzed Xnet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 166 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
xnet.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.5 s
38/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.248
50/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
166 ms
213 ms
71 ms
72 ms
93 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xnet.net, 72% (44 requests) were made to Xnet.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Xnet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 587.8 kB (26%)
2.2 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Xnet.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XNet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 473.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xnet.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 473.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (71%)
51
15
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XNet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
xnet.net
166 ms
www.xnet.com
213 ms
normalize.css
71 ms
ie8.css
72 ms
93 ms
css
24 ms
232 ms
icondemo.js
45 ms
excanvas.js
107 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
80 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
81 ms
jquerytransit.js
82 ms
css
13 ms
364 ms
css
14 ms
css
24 ms
css
26 ms
css
24 ms
fonts.css
56 ms
font-awesome.css
58 ms
icomoon-fonts.css
92 ms
jupiter-icons.css
80 ms
theme-styles.css
143 ms
responsive-theme.css
170 ms
contact-us.png
56 ms
about-bg.png
57 ms
blog.png
52 ms
cutomer-support.png
53 ms
data-center.png
55 ms
why-xnet.png
54 ms
service.png
99 ms
our-customer.png
99 ms
resources.png
99 ms
xnet-logo2.png
100 ms
red-xnet1.jpg
100 ms
withxnet1.jpg
166 ms
high-performance.png
133 ms
intense-customisation.png
132 ms
high-touch.png
129 ms
dont-hiren.png
133 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
37 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
38 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
36 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
110 ms
text-big-bg11.jpg
277 ms
text-big-bg2new.jpg
1374 ms
txt-bg-new-nnn.jpg
1534 ms
sep-bg.png
135 ms
call-ico.png
137 ms
email-us.png
138 ms
business-hours.png
139 ms
ga.js
13 ms
slddbg62.jpg
207 ms
E44LYN4bXPiBT-TMwacNsvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
96 ms
2hig-tnMw8lXZsjwuh-9ow.ttf
96 ms
evC1haE-MsorTl_A7_uSGaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
95 ms
__utm.gif
61 ms
skin.css
41 ms
style.css
39 ms
xnet.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
xnet.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
xnet.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xnet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xnet.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
xnet.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XNet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: