Tools & Wizards About Us
xperix.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

xperix.io

Digital Transformation for PLM, ALM, and CAE | Rochester | XPERIX

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

64 ms

xperix.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xperix.io homepage info - get ready to check XPERIX best content right away, or after learning these important things about xperix.io

With over 40 years of experience, XPERIX is disrupting traditional consulting for PLM, ALM, and CAE / Simulation. We assist companies to take advantage of new solutions for 10% - 50% improvement in pr...

Visit xperix.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Xperix.io page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xperix.io performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,820 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.xperix.io

85 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

71 ms

minified.js

72 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

72 ms

polyfill.min.js

312 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Xperix.io, 36% (22 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 20% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (675 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 645.6 kB (55%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

525.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Xperix.io main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 769.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 607.9 kB

  • Original 769.4 kB
  • After minification 767.5 kB
  • After compression 161.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 607.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 73.1 kB
  • After minification 73.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. XPERIX images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 37.8 kB

  • Original 328.3 kB
  • After minification 322.9 kB
  • After compression 290.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (59%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of XPERIX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.xperix.io

www.xperix.io

85 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

71 ms

minified.js

minified.js

72 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

72 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

312 ms

js

js

135 ms

thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js

108 ms

main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js

main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js

110 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

107 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

107 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

108 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

108 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

109 ms

8874cedf415a431f853bfa39df765499.js.ubembed.com

8874cedf415a431f853bfa39df765499.js.ubembed.com

275 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

84 ms

1d4814_7d853cc3469745b79616f03f145f4b9a~mv2_d_5100_1200_s_2.png

1d4814_7d853cc3469745b79616f03f145f4b9a~mv2_d_5100_1200_s_2.png

253 ms

ba42ca_df1d73c1b8694a48a482466b0d991884~mv2.jpg

ba42ca_df1d73c1b8694a48a482466b0d991884~mv2.jpg

466 ms

ec710b59c77d4b8f87c89c40d690cd18.jpg

ec710b59c77d4b8f87c89c40d690cd18.jpg

499 ms

5e960dc55c064a92aeb2aaa31d57cbcb.jpg

5e960dc55c064a92aeb2aaa31d57cbcb.jpg

461 ms

e63498afac804a82a4a8a64fdef2c6fd.jpg

e63498afac804a82a4a8a64fdef2c6fd.jpg

451 ms

e3dc67d845096c32e5039d17e9b61565.jpg

e3dc67d845096c32e5039d17e9b61565.jpg

515 ms

1d4814_7afd2d562a624bc3adbafce6924c2706~mv2_d_6000_4000_s_4_2.jpg

1d4814_7afd2d562a624bc3adbafce6924c2706~mv2_d_6000_4000_s_4_2.jpg

610 ms

1d4814_7afd2d562a624bc3adbafce6924c2706~mv2_d_6000_4000_s_4_2.jpg

1d4814_7afd2d562a624bc3adbafce6924c2706~mv2_d_6000_4000_s_4_2.jpg

675 ms

3e3776b78a7f4dfb9dd68e7ed428c65a.jpg

3e3776b78a7f4dfb9dd68e7ed428c65a.jpg

628 ms

ff80818164a616390164b307adee674e.js

ff80818164a616390164b307adee674e.js

211 ms

174 ms

loader.js

loader.js

173 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

104 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

99 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

83 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

83 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

83 ms

9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff

9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff

82 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

83 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

83 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

147 ms

203 ms

call-tracking_7.js

call-tracking_7.js

115 ms

zpanel_20170605.js

zpanel_20170605.js

133 ms

zsizzle.20221110.js

zsizzle.20221110.js

199 ms

ztrack.20221110.js

ztrack.20221110.js

208 ms

175 ms

174 ms

172 ms

171 ms

169 ms

168 ms

208 ms

193 ms

198 ms

194 ms

198 ms

193 ms

wcm

wcm

15 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

11 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

27 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

17 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

5 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

xperix.io accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

xperix.io best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

xperix.io SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xperix.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Xperix.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xperix.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of XPERIX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: