Tools & Wizards About Us
xtraxor.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

xtraxor.com

Page Load Speed

10.2 sec in total

First Response

599 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

5.8 sec

xtraxor.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Xtraxor content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about xtraxor.com

Xtraxor Technologies Pvt. Ltd. is an expert in software solution provider, as a creative and Website design agency Web Design Agency in Australia, Web development Agency in Australia, Web page design ...

Visit xtraxor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Xtraxor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 599 ms and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xtraxor.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

xtraxor.com

599 ms

879 ms

analytics.js

340 ms

components.css

794 ms

responsee.css

787 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Xtraxor.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Xtraxor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 84.6 kB (65%)

Content Size

130.0 kB

After Optimization

45.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Xtraxor.com main page is 130.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 79.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 63.2 kB

  • Original 79.9 kB
  • After minification 72.7 kB
  • After compression 16.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 21.5 kB

  • Original 50.1 kB
  • After minification 50.1 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.5 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

37

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xtraxor. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

xtraxor.com

xtraxor.com

599 ms

879 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

340 ms

components.css

components.css

794 ms

responsee.css

responsee.css

787 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

804 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

856 ms

style.css

style.css

800 ms

css

css

272 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

437 ms

etline.css

etline.css

606 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

1087 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

825 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

841 ms

responsee.js

responsee.js

841 ms

template-scripts.js

template-scripts.js

856 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1138 ms

ideal-image-slider.css

ideal-image-slider.css

1087 ms

default.css

default.css

1102 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

108 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1102 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1055 ms

ideal-image-slider.min.js

ideal-image-slider.min.js

1565 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1564 ms

iis-captions.js

iis-captions.js

1564 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

logo.png

logo.png

508 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

269 ms

about_us.jpg

about_us.jpg

283 ms

home15-mobile1.png

home15-mobile1.png

273 ms

adsct-logo.png

adsct-logo.png

268 ms

partner_logo-21.png

partner_logo-21.png

615 ms

OVC_logo.png

OVC_logo.png

521 ms

no-image.png

no-image.png

504 ms

Join-Our-Team.png

Join-Our-Team.png

513 ms

home14-client-1.png

home14-client-1.png

594 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

975 ms

linkdin.png

linkdin.png

746 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

760 ms

SEO Factors

xtraxor.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xtraxor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Xtraxor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

xtraxor.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: