Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

xtremebeauty.net

xtremebeauty.net

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

350 ms

Resources Loaded

965 ms

Page Rendered

245 ms

xtremebeauty.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to xtremebeauty.net homepage info - get ready to check Xtremebeauty best content right away, or after learning these important things about xtremebeauty.net

Visit xtremebeauty.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Xtremebeauty.net page load time and found that the first response time was 350 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

xtremebeauty.net performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

57/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

xtremebeauty.net

350 ms

css

34 ms

css

45 ms

uniform.default.css

34 ms

styles.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Xtremebeauty.net, 46% (36 requests) were made to Cdn4.bigcommerce.com and 42% (33 requests) were made to Cdn3.bigcommerce.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (374 ms) belongs to the original domain Xtremebeauty.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 451.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Xtremebeauty.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 39.0 kB

  • Original 46.6 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Xtremebeauty images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 266.0 kB

  • Original 344.5 kB
  • After minification 253.3 kB
  • After compression 78.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 266.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 138.9 kB

  • Original 170.3 kB
  • After minification 138.6 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Xtremebeauty.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 138.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (51%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Xtremebeauty. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

xtremebeauty.net accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

xtremebeauty.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

xtremebeauty.net SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Xtremebeauty.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Xtremebeauty.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Xtremebeauty. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: