4.6 sec in total
644 ms
3.6 sec
407 ms
Visit y-p.uk now to see the best up-to-date Y P content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about y-p.uk
YP Solutions Ltd, a professional Lancashire website design agency specialising in the development of engaging, eye-catching websites and innovative mobile apps for over 10 years. Get monthly web desig...
Visit y-p.ukWe analyzed Y-p.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 644 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
y-p.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value44.5 s
0/100
25%
Value20.3 s
0/100
10%
Value3,740 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
644 ms
44 ms
64 ms
65 ms
61 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Y-p.uk, 16% (10 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Onum-wp.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (746 ms) belongs to the original domain Y-p.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 6.1 MB (86%)
7.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Y-p.uk main page is 7.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 186.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Y P needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.9 MB or 91% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 159 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 313 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Y-p.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (31%)
49
34
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Y P. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.y-p.uk
644 ms
gtm.js
44 ms
js
64 ms
js
65 ms
js
61 ms
wpo-minify-header-d548989a.min.css
432 ms
wpo-minify-header-9b4d2b78.min.js
746 ms
js
63 ms
js
60 ms
js
62 ms
js
61 ms
jquery.min.js
171 ms
wpo-minify-footer-96273ee5.min.css
340 ms
wpo-minify-footer-5fb87eca.min.js
582 ms
wpo-minify-footer-75d20881.min.js
394 ms
js
202 ms
analytics.js
178 ms
173 ms
js
163 ms
collect
87 ms
collect
124 ms
103 ms
mem1-1.jpg
187 ms
mem2-1.jpg
181 ms
mem3-1.jpg
180 ms
mem6-1.jpg
181 ms
mem5-1.jpg
200 ms
logo3.png
179 ms
bg-header-home4.png
318 ms
header-home4.png
178 ms
shape1-home4-2.png
179 ms
gg-rating.png
179 ms
image1-home4.png
252 ms
laravel1.png
251 ms
magento1.png
250 ms
wordpress1.png
251 ms
apache1.png
333 ms
whm1.png
333 ms
cpanel1.png
332 ms
android-ios1.png
351 ms
bg1-home4.png
350 ms
service1-home4.png
398 ms
service2-home4.png
422 ms
service3-home4.png
423 ms
bg-counter-1.jpg
424 ms
3-best-rated.png
440 ms
fsb.png
438 ms
committed_small.png
503 ms
yp-logo-no-BG.png
514 ms
Flaticon.svg
657 ms
Flaticon.woff
457 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
486 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
567 ms
eicons.woff
717 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
637 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
547 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
559 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
603 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
638 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4WxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
638 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
682 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu5mxMKTU1Kvnz.woff
709 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu72xMKTU1Kvnz.woff
708 ms
y-p.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
y-p.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
y-p.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Y-p.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Y-p.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
y-p.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Y P. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: