4.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.5 sec
175 ms
Visit yagm.ru now to see the best up-to-date Yagm content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about yagm.ru
Visit yagm.ruWe analyzed Yagm.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
yagm.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.5 s
0/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.1 s
2/100
10%
Value230 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.791
5/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
1050 ms
249 ms
372 ms
251 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Yagm.ru, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Yagm.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 707.8 kB (46%)
1.5 MB
818.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Yagm.ru main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 761.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Yagm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 518.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 518.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yagm.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 135.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (37%)
83
52
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yagm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
yagm.ru
1050 ms
k2.css
249 ms
default_div.css
372 ms
modal.css
251 ms
jcemediabox.css
252 ms
style.css
252 ms
colorbox.css
253 ms
style.css
372 ms
style.css
373 ms
mootools-core.js
621 ms
core.js
375 ms
jquery.min.js
9 ms
k2.js
374 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
743 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
495 ms
jquery.media.js
619 ms
functions.js
654 ms
validateForm.js
496 ms
mootools-more.js
1115 ms
modal.js
655 ms
jcemediabox.js
867 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
763 ms
engine.js
763 ms
system.css
763 ms
general.css
865 ms
css
31 ms
template.css
867 ms
template.responsive.css
867 ms
css
49 ms
jquery.js
1142 ms
script.js
989 ms
script.responsive.js
990 ms
system.css
125 ms
webfont.js
22 ms
3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews
371 ms
246891
262 ms
pageglare.png
128 ms
header.jpg
125 ms
object1091714374.png
128 ms
yagm_2.jpg
128 ms
adres.png
127 ms
mail.png
127 ms
tel.png
250 ms
men_015_bg.jpg
251 ms
menu_015_h_pointer.jpg
251 ms
______________.jpg
252 ms
UGB_950_12.jpg
252 ms
______________________________________Endress_ESE_604_DYS_ES_80_979182.jpg
252 ms
______________________________________ESE_804_SDBS_DC2.jpg
374 ms
3c444a0dcfaac2a6056ec4230266c6f3.jpg
376 ms
__________________1_STV50_X_012.jpg
376 ms
_____________________________2.jpg
377 ms
___________________________2.jpg
378 ms
_________________________3.jpg
377 ms
_____________________________________2.jpg
497 ms
_________________________________2.jpg
500 ms
_____________________2.jpg
501 ms
tochka1.jpg
499 ms
__________2.jpg
500 ms
____________2.jpg
500 ms
Racer_kat.jpg
621 ms
Main_Cat.jpg
624 ms
Drel_Main.jpg
626 ms
Main.jpg
625 ms
nzgu.jpg
625 ms
abac-logo1.gif
625 ms
aet_logo90.gif
745 ms
bw-logo.jpg
747 ms
endress-logo.gif
748 ms
ewm-logo.jpg
750 ms
fubag-logo.jpg
749 ms
logo_Kerona.jpg
735 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf
43 ms
jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEwA.ttf
43 ms
jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKA.ttf
44 ms
jizdRExUiTo99u79D0e8fOydKxUY.ttf
64 ms
jizYRExUiTo99u79D0e0w8mN.ttf
64 ms
watch.js
0 ms
hit
258 ms
popup.html
999 ms
logo-blue-small.gif
748 ms
logo-koshin.gif
750 ms
matrix.jpg
750 ms
resanta.jpg
750 ms
skat.PNG
751 ms
balt.JPG
751 ms
Racer_logo.jpg
751 ms
Torrent_120_42_2.jpg
752 ms
searchicon.png
872 ms
overlay.png
873 ms
hit
494 ms
border.png
752 ms
controls.png
751 ms
yagm.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
yagm.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
yagm.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yagm.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yagm.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
yagm.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Yagm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: