5.6 sec in total
263 ms
4.4 sec
915 ms
Visit yellowcat.london now to see the best up-to-date Yellow Cat content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about yellowcat.london
Recruitment and talent solutions for the creative industries We’re an award-winning team of industry experts dedicated to connecting talented creatives with exceptional clients. Our mission is to have...
Visit yellowcat.londonWe analyzed Yellowcat.london page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
yellowcat.london performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value17.7 s
4/100
10%
263 ms
1782 ms
166 ms
250 ms
254 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Yellowcat.london, 27% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Yellowcat.london.
Page size can be reduced by 297.7 kB (8%)
4.0 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Yellowcat.london main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 179.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Yellow Cat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 197 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 519 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yellowcat.london has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (66%)
59
20
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yellow Cat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
yellowcat.london
263 ms
www.yellowcat.london
1782 ms
style.min.css
166 ms
theme.min.css
250 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
254 ms
frontend.min.css
349 ms
swiper.min.css
261 ms
post-97.css
264 ms
frontend.min.css
368 ms
all.min.css
335 ms
v4-shims.min.css
339 ms
global.css
355 ms
post-14411.css
359 ms
post-48.css
418 ms
post-52.css
419 ms
post-14628.css
429 ms
general.min.css
435 ms
css
26 ms
fontawesome.min.css
439 ms
regular.min.css
455 ms
solid.min.css
503 ms
brands.min.css
504 ms
script.min.js
440 ms
v4-shims.min.js
449 ms
jquery.min.js
543 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
470 ms
animations.min.css
512 ms
general.min.js
511 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
524 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
533 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
645 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
694 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
646 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
647 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
727 ms
hooks.min.js
647 ms
i18n.min.js
662 ms
frontend.min.js
693 ms
waypoints.min.js
695 ms
core.min.js
705 ms
frontend.min.js
625 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
621 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
612 ms
yc-brand-yellow-500.png
237 ms
Background-holder.png
756 ms
ig.jpg
250 ms
vice.jpg
262 ms
Cain-Abel.jpg
292 ms
tag.jpg
295 ms
London-Street-scaled.jpg
724 ms
diversity2.jpg
328 ms
Universal-Music-logo.png
350 ms
itv.jpg
375 ms
Therapy-logo.png
381 ms
750.jpg
415 ms
Evolutions.jpg
439 ms
virgin-media.jpg
458 ms
monsoon.jpg
464 ms
Clinic.png
502 ms
Zone-logo.png
529 ms
the_rec_net-1.png
541 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
65 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
64 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
48 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
63 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
549 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
505 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
64 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
69 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
66 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
84 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
88 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
86 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf
87 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq5Z9WXh0ow.ttf
85 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf
87 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR9WXh0ow.ttf
130 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R8WXh0ow.ttf
132 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq3p6WXh0ow.ttf
132 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf
130 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqyR6WXh0ow.ttf
132 ms
JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jqw16WXh0ow.ttf
131 ms
eicons.woff
718 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
703 ms
yellowcat.london accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
yellowcat.london best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
yellowcat.london SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yellowcat.london can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yellowcat.london main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
yellowcat.london
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Yellow Cat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: