Tools & Wizards About Us
yellowtom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

yellowtom.com

Find local businesses details by category and by town

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

yellowtom.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to yellowtom.com homepage info - get ready to check Yellowtom best content right away, or after learning these important things about yellowtom.com

Yellowtom, number 1 local business website in United Kingdom to find local businesses in need including local reviews, contact details, opening hours, offers in your area.

Visit yellowtom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Yellowtom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

yellowtom.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

yellowtom.com

235 ms

www.yellowtom.co.uk

208 ms

www.yellowtom.co.uk

322 ms

analytics.js

18 ms

fbevents.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Yellowtom.com, 76% (37 requests) were made to Yellowtom.co.uk and 6% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (462 ms) relates to the external source Yellowtom.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 138.2 kB (37%)

Content Size

375.6 kB

After Optimization

237.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Yellowtom.com main page is 375.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 233.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 35.8 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 44.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Yellowtom needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 97.1 kB

  • Original 233.1 kB
  • After minification 233.1 kB
  • After compression 136.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.1 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 57.2 kB
  • After minification 57.0 kB
  • After compression 50.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Yellowtom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (68%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Yellowtom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

yellowtom.com

yellowtom.com

235 ms

www.yellowtom.co.uk

www.yellowtom.co.uk

208 ms

www.yellowtom.co.uk

www.yellowtom.co.uk

322 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

33 ms

base.css

base.css

78 ms

jquery1_10.min.js

jquery1_10.min.js

233 ms

fontawesome.js

fontawesome.js

229 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

313 ms

main.js

main.js

234 ms

jquery.autocomplete.css

jquery.autocomplete.css

236 ms

jquery.autocomplete.js

jquery.autocomplete.js

238 ms

jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js

462 ms

jquery.mask.js

jquery.mask.js

314 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

js

js

74 ms

index.css

index.css

238 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

80 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

91 ms

index.css

index.css

94 ms

button.css

button.css

94 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

95 ms

common.css

common.css

154 ms

header.css

header.css

168 ms

nav.css

nav.css

167 ms

forms.css

forms.css

166 ms

home.css

home.css

165 ms

town.css

town.css

220 ms

footer.css

footer.css

228 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

240 ms

mixins.css

mixins.css

148 ms

variables.css

variables.css

148 ms

css2

css2

35 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

37 ms

fe459689b4.css

fe459689b4.css

25 ms

font-awesome-css.min.css

font-awesome-css.min.css

28 ms

logo.png

logo.png

86 ms

mobile-logo.png

mobile-logo.png

77 ms

1_homebannerimage.jpg

1_homebannerimage.jpg

152 ms

bannerpic1.webp

bannerpic1.webp

230 ms

phone.webp

phone.webp

229 ms

facebook.webp

facebook.webp

151 ms

instagram.webp

instagram.webp

140 ms

x.webp

x.webp

149 ms

in.webp

in.webp

215 ms

youtube.webp

youtube.webp

225 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

53 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

53 ms

Accessibility Review

yellowtom.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

yellowtom.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

yellowtom.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Yellowtom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Yellowtom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

yellowtom.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Yellowtom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: