Tools & Wizards About Us
ziggywheels.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

ziggywheels.com

ZiggyWheels – Redefining The Golf Cart Experience, Unmatched In The USA!

Page Load Speed

15.3 sec in total

First Response

2.8 sec

Resources Loaded

12.2 sec

Page Rendered

373 ms

ziggywheels.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ziggywheels.com homepage info - get ready to check Ziggy Wheels best content right away, or after learning these important things about ziggywheels.com

Visit ziggywheels.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ziggywheels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 12.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ziggywheels.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.1 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ziggywheels.com

2757 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

620 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

618 ms

frontend.min.css

646 ms

swiper.min.css

643 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Ziggywheels.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ziggywheels.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 271.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ziggywheels.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 624.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 108.5 kB

  • Original 137.5 kB
  • After minification 134.0 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 848 B

  • Original 624.2 kB
  • After minification 623.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ziggy Wheels images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 103.7 kB

  • Original 453.8 kB
  • After minification 453.8 kB
  • After compression 350.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 58.5 kB

  • Original 160.3 kB
  • After minification 160.2 kB
  • After compression 101.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ziggywheels.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (85%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ziggy Wheels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ziggywheels.com

ziggywheels.com

2757 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

620 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

618 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

646 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

643 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

649 ms

post-12.css

post-12.css

824 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1446 ms

global.css

global.css

865 ms

fadeInDown.min.css

fadeInDown.min.css

866 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

863 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

1031 ms

post-30.css

post-30.css

1088 ms

bootstrap-light.min.css

bootstrap-light.min.css

1083 ms

base.min.css

base.min.css

1098 ms

wp-gutenberg.min.css

wp-gutenberg.min.css

1689 ms

int-wpcf7.min.css

int-wpcf7.min.css

1248 ms

int-mc4wp.min.css

int-mc4wp.min.css

1297 ms

int-rev-slider.min.css

int-rev-slider.min.css

1306 ms

int-elem-base.min.css

int-elem-base.min.css

1317 ms

int-elementor-pro.min.css

int-elementor-pro.min.css

1459 ms

header-base.min.css

header-base.min.css

1514 ms

mod-tools.min.css

mod-tools.min.css

1526 ms

header-el-base.min.css

header-el-base.min.css

1534 ms

el-social-icons.min.css

el-social-icons.min.css

1651 ms

int-elem-el-animations.min.css

int-elem-el-animations.min.css

1671 ms

el-section-title.min.css

el-section-title.min.css

1727 ms

opt-widget-collapse.min.css

opt-widget-collapse.min.css

1746 ms

footer-base.min.css

footer-base.min.css

1753 ms

opt-scrolltotop.min.css

opt-scrolltotop.min.css

1870 ms

wd-search-form.min.css

wd-search-form.min.css

1886 ms

xts-default_header-1720639457.css

xts-default_header-1720639457.css

1895 ms

xts-theme_settings_default-1700516585.css

xts-theme_settings_default-1700516585.css

1964 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

45 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2199 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1987 ms

device.min.js

device.min.js

2083 ms

css

css

18 ms

e-202448.js

e-202448.js

13 ms

post-160.css

post-160.css

1684 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

1719 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1568 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1581 ms

index.js

index.js

2881 ms

index.js

index.js

2748 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

2004 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

1988 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

1566 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

1666 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1833 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1657 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

1863 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1942 ms

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js

1845 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

1787 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

1848 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

1940 ms

cookie.min.js

cookie.min.js

1853 ms

helpers.min.js

helpers.min.js

1857 ms

woocommerceNotices.min.js

woocommerceNotices.min.js

1851 ms

scrollBar.min.js

scrollBar.min.js

1947 ms

headerBuilder.min.js

headerBuilder.min.js

2020 ms

menuOffsets.min.js

menuOffsets.min.js

1902 ms

menuSetUp.min.js

menuSetUp.min.js

1898 ms

widgetCollapse.min.js

widgetCollapse.min.js

1922 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

1963 ms

scrollTop.min.js

scrollTop.min.js

1995 ms

mobileNavigation.min.js

mobileNavigation.min.js

2001 ms

Group-8.svg

Group-8.svg

1554 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

1562 ms

Rectangle-9-1.png

Rectangle-9-1.png

5126 ms

Rectangle-12.png

Rectangle-12.png

2314 ms

IMG_3940.jpg

IMG_3940.jpg

2340 ms

image-4.png

image-4.png

2641 ms

image-5.png

image-5.png

1766 ms

image-6.png

image-6.png

2410 ms

image-7-1.png

image-7-1.png

1982 ms

Group-15.png

Group-15.png

2163 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

48 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

62 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

96 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

94 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

60 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

58 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

59 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

58 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

60 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

61 ms

Accessibility Review

ziggywheels.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ziggywheels.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ziggywheels.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ziggywheels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ziggywheels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ziggywheels.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ziggy Wheels. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: