43.2 sec in total
144 ms
42.6 sec
438 ms
Welcome to zimbra.tn homepage info - get ready to check Zimbra best content right away, or after learning these important things about zimbra.tn
Des centaines de millions de personnes font confiance à La messagerie Collaborative Zimbra
Visit zimbra.tnWe analyzed Zimbra.tn page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 43.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 23 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
zimbra.tn performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value33.8 s
0/100
10%
Value2,590 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.039
99/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
144 ms
1899 ms
265 ms
19318 ms
270 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Zimbra.tn, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Zimbra.tn.
Page size can be reduced by 102.0 kB (14%)
749.9 kB
647.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Zimbra.tn main page is 749.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 354.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 81.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zimbra images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zimbra.tn has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (90%)
50
5
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zimbra. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
zimbra.tn
144 ms
zimbra.tn
1899 ms
style.min.css
265 ms
styles.css
19318 ms
style.css
270 ms
style.css
291 ms
adaptive.css
273 ms
retina.css
19752 ms
fontello.css
531 ms
fontello-custom.css
515 ms
animate.css
516 ms
ilightbox.css
19870 ms
dark-skin.css
19912 ms
start-it.css
780 ms
css
46 ms
frontend-style.css
1033 ms
plugin-style.css
19912 ms
plugin-adaptive.css
1285 ms
jquery.min.js
1547 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1824 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
2071 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
2328 ms
js.cookie.min.js
2594 ms
woocommerce.min.js
2844 ms
debounced-resize.min.js
3097 ms
modernizr.min.js
3359 ms
respond.min.js
3640 ms
jquery.iLightBox.min.js
3903 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
19980 ms
email-decode.min.js
19316 ms
css
49 ms
wc-blocks.css
19584 ms
rs6.css
19979 ms
jquery.megaMenu.js
19978 ms
hooks.min.js
19979 ms
i18n.min.js
19979 ms
index.js
19979 ms
index.js
19978 ms
api.js
53 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
74 ms
rbtools.min.js
19977 ms
rs6.min.js
19718 ms
cmsmasters-hover-slider.min.js
19716 ms
easing.min.js
19710 ms
easy-pie-chart.min.js
19686 ms
mousewheel.min.js
19982 ms
owlcarousel.min.js
19980 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
20381 ms
request-animation-frame.min.js
19699 ms
scrollspy.js
19693 ms
scroll-to.min.js
19454 ms
stellar.min.js
19448 ms
waypoints.min.js
19215 ms
jquery.script.js
18929 ms
jquery.theme-script.js
18680 ms
jquery.tweet.min.js
18422 ms
smooth-sticky.min.js
18395 ms
comment-reply.min.js
18168 ms
jquery.plugin-script.js
17906 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
17644 ms
order-attribution.min.js
17380 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
17306 ms
index.js
1935 ms
352_n.png
19931 ms
dummy.png
19932 ms
email-marketing-1.png
1352 ms
concept-design-web-moderne-style-plat_23-2147935005-e1588377159867.jpg
19931 ms
zimbraa.png
1483 ms
zimbra-adaptive.png
19931 ms
Sendinblue-e1589417935539.png
19931 ms
spam-e1589418889953.png
1737 ms
hhhhhh-scaled.jpg
19881 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPKba5a7dvg.ttf
227 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPJ_a5a7dvg.ttf
269 ms
o-0bIpQoyXQa2RxT7-5B6Ryxs2E_6n1iPHjd5a7dvg.ttf
284 ms
fontello.woff
19880 ms
fontello-custom.woff
19720 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
92 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
136 ms
recaptcha__en.js
25 ms
fontello.ttf
625 ms
fontello-custom.ttf
382 ms
zimbra.tn accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
zimbra.tn best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
zimbra.tn SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zimbra.tn can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zimbra.tn main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
zimbra.tn
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zimbra. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: