Tools & Wizards About Us
zipleaf.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

zipleaf.us

United States Business Directory

Page Load Speed

714 ms in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

490 ms

Page Rendered

196 ms

zipleaf.us screenshot

About Website

Visit zipleaf.us now to see the best up-to-date Zipleaf content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about zipleaf.us

Find local products and services, fast and easy on ZipLeaf United States directory. Add your business for free!

Visit zipleaf.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Zipleaf.us page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 686 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

zipleaf.us performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

zipleaf.us

28 ms

www.zipleaf.us

79 ms

exp_logo.png

87 ms

font-awesome.min.css

61 ms

ga.js

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Zipleaf.us, 82% (46 requests) were made to Cdn.zipleaf.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.zipleaf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.2 kB (28%)

Content Size

487.9 kB

After Optimization

350.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Zipleaf.us main page is 487.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 280.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 68.3 kB
  • After minification 66.4 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 280.8 kB
  • After minification 259.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zipleaf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 60.1 kB

  • Original 138.7 kB
  • After minification 138.7 kB
  • After compression 78.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.1 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (13%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

40

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zipleaf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

zipleaf.us

zipleaf.us

28 ms

www.zipleaf.us

www.zipleaf.us

79 ms

exp_logo.png

exp_logo.png

87 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

61 ms

ga.js

ga.js

56 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

60 ms

bxslider.gz.js

bxslider.gz.js

74 ms

go.gz.js

go.gz.js

76 ms

js

js

128 ms

img-free.png

img-free.png

126 ms

us-1.jpg

us-1.jpg

127 ms

bgka1zgagc25.png

bgka1zgagc25.png

155 ms

fri41im5wusp.png

fri41im5wusp.png

130 ms

bx4txa4gnn26.png

bx4txa4gnn26.png

129 ms

9wv76xgd7vls.png

9wv76xgd7vls.png

153 ms

dnhx3pdf8kci.png

dnhx3pdf8kci.png

128 ms

vf5z0mw3gwy6.png

vf5z0mw3gwy6.png

130 ms

e6t1k08y8ja1.png

e6t1k08y8ja1.png

175 ms

cvtae62mhgqr.png

cvtae62mhgqr.png

253 ms

2tfiu6exv9r8.png

2tfiu6exv9r8.png

174 ms

qjyt0f821s25.png

qjyt0f821s25.png

175 ms

oviw1zeuij22.png

oviw1zeuij22.png

187 ms

g7q177znhn67.png

g7q177znhn67.png

205 ms

l87jq147s2ij.png

l87jq147s2ij.png

251 ms

13fqhl8t1vs6.png

13fqhl8t1vs6.png

205 ms

02qvayuqzfe6.png

02qvayuqzfe6.png

251 ms

0zdnaf618bif.png

0zdnaf618bif.png

250 ms

mhze2hbtarea.png

mhze2hbtarea.png

252 ms

gyq64u2vk69l.png

gyq64u2vk69l.png

251 ms

ogwitek314s3.png

ogwitek314s3.png

293 ms

0hu1kt0prtj7.png

0hu1kt0prtj7.png

254 ms

lw7s4lu3i6y7.png

lw7s4lu3i6y7.png

287 ms

jxiz65cwdxoo.png

jxiz65cwdxoo.png

276 ms

ge3yxdw8ztru.png

ge3yxdw8ztru.png

265 ms

4cnc9caizi7w.png

4cnc9caizi7w.png

282 ms

oz4xpx0erbgj.png

oz4xpx0erbgj.png

283 ms

kt3zvg6wpqrr.png

kt3zvg6wpqrr.png

283 ms

jx2qt3v0qo1i.png

jx2qt3v0qo1i.png

294 ms

16d8xts7dmxz.png

16d8xts7dmxz.png

314 ms

tul8a3qkrj0a.png

tul8a3qkrj0a.png

316 ms

dm0t0s1rp5pc.png

dm0t0s1rp5pc.png

301 ms

bm1gwmupp2xv.png

bm1gwmupp2xv.png

306 ms

4j3ibxubzl8l.png

4j3ibxubzl8l.png

261 ms

j2jai2kyhub7.png

j2jai2kyhub7.png

260 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

30 ms

u9jn8u323xb4.png

u9jn8u323xb4.png

212 ms

lv6a75lhyuh7.png

lv6a75lhyuh7.png

228 ms

nsvucxsxw1av.png

nsvucxsxw1av.png

229 ms

mzh3b16aswoa.png

mzh3b16aswoa.png

210 ms

oej1dc2iynwi.png

oej1dc2iynwi.png

207 ms

country_flags.png

country_flags.png

209 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

192 ms

controls.png

controls.png

186 ms

js

js

42 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

17 ms

collect

collect

46 ms

Accessibility Review

zipleaf.us accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

zipleaf.us best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

zipleaf.us SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zipleaf.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zipleaf.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

zipleaf.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Zipleaf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: