3 sec in total
145 ms
2.4 sec
495 ms
Welcome to zyga.com homepage info - get ready to check Zyga best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about zyga.com
Forsale Lander
Visit zyga.comWe analyzed Zyga.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
zyga.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value3,290 ms
2/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.3 s
24/100
10%
145 ms
422 ms
84 ms
139 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 153 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Zyga.com, 54% (82 requests) were made to Cdn.callrail.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Zyga.com.
Page size can be reduced by 89.5 kB (7%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Zyga.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Zyga images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Zyga.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 123 (83%)
148
25
The browser has sent 148 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Zyga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 110 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
zyga.com
145 ms
zyga.com
422 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
84 ms
infopopup.css
139 ms
prettyPhoto.css
182 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
182 ms
style.css
241 ms
shortcodes.css
183 ms
light_style.css
181 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
193 ms
wpr-hamburger.css
237 ms
wprmenu.css
238 ms
style.css
238 ms
basic.css
243 ms
skin.css
248 ms
dashicons.min.css
403 ms
css
79 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
291 ms
jquery.js
407 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
292 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
292 ms
video-lightbox.js
303 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
405 ms
modernizr.custom.js
348 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
348 ms
wprmenu.js
359 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
427 ms
global.js
426 ms
js
107 ms
swap.js
70 ms
swap.js
78 ms
swap.js
79 ms
swap.js
76 ms
swap.js
75 ms
swap.js
76 ms
swap.js
83 ms
swap.js
83 ms
swap.js
86 ms
swap.js
89 ms
swap.js
92 ms
swap.js
86 ms
swap.js
97 ms
swap.js
95 ms
swap.js
100 ms
swap.js
99 ms
swap.js
100 ms
swap.js
101 ms
swap.js
112 ms
swap.js
173 ms
swap.js
108 ms
swap.js
112 ms
swap.js
111 ms
swap.js
114 ms
swap.js
121 ms
swap.js
124 ms
swap.js
120 ms
swap.js
124 ms
swap.js
124 ms
swap.js
132 ms
swap.js
131 ms
swap.js
137 ms
swap.js
134 ms
swap.js
135 ms
swap.js
147 ms
swap.js
147 ms
position.min.js
468 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
490 ms
ubermenu.min.js
490 ms
collapse.js
490 ms
superfish.min.js
489 ms
superfish.args.min.js
489 ms
skip-links.min.js
489 ms
responsive-menus.min.js
543 ms
home.js
543 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
543 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
543 ms
wp-embed.min.js
495 ms
swap.js
83 ms
swap.js
80 ms
swap.js
84 ms
swap.js
89 ms
swap.js
90 ms
swap.js
103 ms
swap.js
82 ms
swap.js
84 ms
swap.js
89 ms
swap.js
93 ms
swap.js
92 ms
swap.js
87 ms
swap.js
91 ms
swap.js
91 ms
swap.js
88 ms
swap.js
92 ms
swap.js
91 ms
swap.js
89 ms
swap.js
87 ms
swap.js
84 ms
swap.js
85 ms
swap.js
87 ms
swap.js
84 ms
swap.js
101 ms
swap.js
84 ms
swap.js
82 ms
swap.js
81 ms
swap.js
82 ms
swap.js
87 ms
swap.js
88 ms
swap.js
83 ms
swap.js
82 ms
swap.js
84 ms
swap.js
78 ms
swap.js
78 ms
swap.js
81 ms
swap.js
81 ms
swap.js
73 ms
swap.js
102 ms
swap.js
74 ms
swap.js
75 ms
swap.js
75 ms
swap.js
69 ms
swap.js
69 ms
swap.js
68 ms
swap.js
70 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
fbevents.js
89 ms
cropped-SImmetry_RGB-new-final.png
262 ms
lock-icon.png
261 ms
stethoscope.png
262 ms
hero.jpg
407 ms
1.png
261 ms
2.png
260 ms
3.png
262 ms
4.png
263 ms
85.png
263 ms
20.png
263 ms
222222.png
786 ms
doc.png
1402 ms
loc.png
322 ms
Screen-Shot-2017-09-13-at-11.06.02-AM.png
460 ms
in.png
322 ms
f.png
351 ms
y.png
352 ms
logo.jpg
420 ms
analytics.js
150 ms
DINWeb.woff
401 ms
AAABVuGyrgAA
6 ms
DINWeb-Bold.woff
386 ms
1572197936403995
161 ms
fancybox_sprite.png
251 ms
collect
71 ms
collect
69 ms
collect
43 ms
ga-audiences
57 ms
zyga.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
zyga.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
zyga.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Zyga.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Zyga.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
zyga.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Zyga. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: