2.7 sec in total
458 ms
2.1 sec
174 ms
Welcome to johnsof.com homepage info - get ready to check Johnsof best content right away, or after learning these important things about johnsof.com
Welcome to the world of Johnsof. A world of excellence in bakery and confectionary products. A world of supreme quality and mouth-watering products. Johnsof still uses only the finest selected ingredi...
Visit johnsof.comWe analyzed Johnsof.com page load time and found that the first response time was 458 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
johnsof.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value20.5 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value550 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.05
99/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
458 ms
24 ms
48 ms
19 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Johnsof.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Johnsof.com.
Page size can be reduced by 79.5 kB (2%)
3.9 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Johnsof.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 170 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Johnsof images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Johnsof.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (62%)
47
18
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Johnsof. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
johnsof.com
458 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
24 ms
css
48 ms
style.min.css
19 ms
settings.css
23 ms
style.min.css
22 ms
hg-mailchimp.css
29 ms
bootstrap.min.css
42 ms
template.min.css
30 ms
znb_frontend.css
40 ms
75-layout.css
47 ms
style.css
386 ms
zn_dynamic.css
367 ms
jquery.js
49 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
49 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
50 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
50 ms
js
73 ms
css
47 ms
font-awesome.css
363 ms
email-decode.min.js
18 ms
hg-mailchimp.js
8 ms
plugins.min.js
9 ms
scrollmagic.js
18 ms
znscript.min.js
19 ms
SmoothScroll.min.js
24 ms
slick.min.js
25 ms
znpb_frontend.bundle.js
32 ms
wp-embed.min.js
31 ms
logo-side.png
452 ms
en.png
334 ms
el.png
359 ms
koulouri-for-slider.jpg
785 ms
napolitano-for-slider.jpg
27 ms
cookies2-for-slider.jpg
810 ms
crouton-for-slider.jpg
66 ms
31435006_l.jpg
68 ms
41656762_l.jpg
128 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISWaA.ttf
101 ms
sdk.js
174 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
74 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
98 ms
glyphicons_halflingsregular.woff
423 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
106 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
143 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
142 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf
142 ms
kl-social-icons.woff
625 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
502 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
268 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
279 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
286 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
294 ms
sdk.js
14 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
825 ms
32 ms
loader.gif
334 ms
revicons.woff
331 ms
print.css
9 ms
johnsof.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
johnsof.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
johnsof.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Johnsof.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Johnsof.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
johnsof.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Johnsof. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: