7.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
4.5 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to lifeox.com homepage info - get ready to check LifeOX best content right away, or after learning these important things about lifeox.com
Difference - LifeOX vs common small ozone device: automatic conversion of active oxygen back into oxygen (faster treatment process), air filtration (leaves no waste products after oxidation process).
Visit lifeox.comWe analyzed Lifeox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
lifeox.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value16.8 s
0/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
1214 ms
63 ms
106 ms
84 ms
278 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Lifeox.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Lifeox-m.lifetechozone.com.
Page size can be reduced by 50.2 kB (3%)
1.6 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifeox.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 720 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. LifeOX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 689 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeox.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (47%)
73
39
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of LifeOX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1214 ms
css2
63 ms
krq2owf.css
106 ms
91dbdb6e96.js
84 ms
style.min.css
278 ms
style.min.css
456 ms
style.min.css
465 ms
style.min.css
403 ms
style.min.css
474 ms
style.min.css
411 ms
blocks.style.build.css
406 ms
style.css
564 ms
reset.css
562 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
569 ms
styles.css
650 ms
styles-mq.css
587 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
59 ms
custom.js
611 ms
styles.css
764 ms
encoder-form.js
764 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
828 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
765 ms
canvasSequence.js
765 ms
autosize.min.js
787 ms
cookiebar-latest.min.js
57 ms
scripts.js
873 ms
wp-embed.min.js
853 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
873 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
912 ms
index.js
923 ms
p.css
37 ms
gtm.js
74 ms
js
66 ms
analytics.js
36 ms
hotjar-3074587.js
106 ms
collect
49 ms
js
46 ms
modules.a02b08e96dea6b9516bd.js
23 ms
obr.jpg
495 ms
anim_062b.png
398 ms
1-430x287.jpg
418 ms
2-430x287.jpg
415 ms
3-430x287.jpg
443 ms
4-430x287.jpg
464 ms
5-430x287.jpg
551 ms
section-bottom.svg
557 ms
aop-e1651561311231.png
769 ms
installation-devices.png
788 ms
installation.png
693 ms
graf.png
746 ms
graf1-1.png
686 ms
graf4.png
688 ms
lifeox-m-1-1472x690.jpg
925 ms
lifeox-m-2-1472x690-02-1472x690.jpg
923 ms
1-1-400x240.jpg
822 ms
5-1-1-400x240.jpg
888 ms
3-1-400x240.jpg
904 ms
4-1-400x240.jpg
927 ms
2-1-400x240.jpg
950 ms
5-1-400x240.jpg
1047 ms
6-400x240.jpg
1048 ms
7-400x240.jpg
1146 ms
8-400x240.jpg
1048 ms
10.png
1016 ms
40.png
1003 ms
90.png
1094 ms
140.png
1087 ms
d
32 ms
d
91 ms
d
92 ms
d
130 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
71 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
87 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf
91 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf
92 ms
250.png
1091 ms
raduan-al-kheir.jpeg
1057 ms
lifetech-carbon-footprint.png
1087 ms
logo.svg
1087 ms
logo-creadot.svg
1175 ms
country
132 ms
anim_062c.png
1028 ms
lifeox.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lifeox.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lifeox.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifeox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifeox.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of LifeOX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: