4.4 sec in total
129 ms
3.4 sec
869 ms
Click here to check amazing Livinghope content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livinghope.org
Living Hope Youth Home. Our mission is to rescue children, train leaders, and reach the nations with the Gospel.
Visit livinghope.orgWe analyzed Livinghope.org page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
livinghope.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value20.0 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value1,220 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value15.6 s
6/100
10%
129 ms
1364 ms
160 ms
158 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Livinghope.org, 12% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Livinghope.org.
Page size can be reduced by 227.4 kB (8%)
2.7 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Livinghope.org main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 192.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.2 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livinghope images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livinghope.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (84%)
82
13
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livinghope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livinghope.org
129 ms
livinghope.org
1364 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
160 ms
classic-themes.min.css
158 ms
styles.css
163 ms
theme.css
165 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
161 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
183 ms
swiper.min.css
209 ms
post-7.css
1205 ms
base.css
210 ms
all.min.css
212 ms
v4-shims.min.css
218 ms
post-147.css
235 ms
css
39 ms
lightgallery.min.css
262 ms
owl.carousel.css
264 ms
magnific-popup.css
265 ms
font-awesome.css
266 ms
icon-custom.css
288 ms
style.css
314 ms
bootstrap.css
324 ms
woocommerce.css
318 ms
template.css
336 ms
style.css
352 ms
custom_script.css
365 ms
css
30 ms
jquery.min.js
372 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
368 ms
Popup.js
374 ms
PopupConfig.js
394 ms
PopupBuilder.js
418 ms
v4-shims.min.js
420 ms
bootstrap.js
426 ms
perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js
428 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
448 ms
jquery.cookie.js
471 ms
lightgallery.min.js
475 ms
waypoints.min.js
479 ms
51 ms
css
13 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
363 ms
post-206.css
354 ms
fontawesome.min.css
377 ms
solid.min.css
376 ms
rs6.css
381 ms
sticky.js
377 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
376 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
380 ms
masonry.min.js
379 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
380 ms
main.js
378 ms
woocommerce.js
380 ms
index.js
376 ms
index.js
380 ms
main.js
382 ms
rbtools.min.js
387 ms
rs6.min.js
436 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
379 ms
js.cookie.min.js
361 ms
woocommerce.min.js
365 ms
add-to-cart.js
356 ms
count-to.js
393 ms
jquery.appear.js
383 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
381 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
387 ms
core.min.js
404 ms
frontend.min.js
403 ms
gtm.js
171 ms
LivingHopeB-200.png
159 ms
LivingHopeW-300.png
119 ms
dummy.png
119 ms
homesponsor02.jpg
159 ms
werescue.jpg
409 ms
wetrain.jpg
378 ms
wereach.jpg
529 ms
LivingHopeW-200.png
377 ms
BePart-PopUp2.jpg
717 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
112 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
329 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
330 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
364 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
364 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
362 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
364 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
364 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
377 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtU.woff
377 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtU.woff
377 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDXbtU.woff
378 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
361 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
484 ms
script.min.js
342 ms
jquery-ui.css
295 ms
bg-footer2.jpg
247 ms
js
207 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
191 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
188 ms
image-placeholder.png
303 ms
css
137 ms
9dd4e43a-c7f0-4aab-bbf2-490e8d9a0d29
298 ms
livinghope.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livinghope.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
livinghope.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livinghope.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Livinghope.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livinghope.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Livinghope. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: