4.3 sec in total
176 ms
3.4 sec
803 ms
Click here to check amazing Rejuvenate content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rejuvenate.digital
Rejuvenate are a Digital Agency in Leeds. Specialising in Web Design & Development, App Development, Video Production & Digital Marketing.
Visit rejuvenate.digitalWe analyzed Rejuvenate.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 176 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rejuvenate.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value5.4 s
57/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
176 ms
384 ms
990 ms
56 ms
23 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Rejuvenate.digital, 10% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rejuvenate.digital.
Page size can be reduced by 5.5 MB (89%)
6.2 MB
690.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Rejuvenate.digital main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 159.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rejuvenate needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.4 MB or 94% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 224 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rejuvenate.digital has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)
13
9
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rejuvenate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rejuvenate.digital
176 ms
rejuvenate.digital
384 ms
www.rejuvenate.digital
990 ms
js
56 ms
jquery.min.js
23 ms
app.min.js
450 ms
thumb__98_117_0_0_auto.png
448 ms
thumb__42_50_0_0_auto.png
277 ms
thumb__1400_0_0_0_auto.png
1257 ms
thumb__600_450_0_0_crop.png
279 ms
thumb__400_300_0_0_crop.png
278 ms
js
62 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
collect
48 ms
collect
38 ms
styles.min.css
180 ms
Poppins-Regular.woff
268 ms
Poppins-Light.woff
277 ms
Poppins-Bold.woff
267 ms
icomoon.ttf
111 ms
rejuvenate.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rejuvenate.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rejuvenate.digital SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rejuvenate.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rejuvenate.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rejuvenate.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rejuvenate. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: