Tools & Wizards About Us
samdevol.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

samdevol.com

Sam Devol – Running with scissors

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

188 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

80 ms

samdevol.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to samdevol.com homepage info - get ready to check Sam Devol best content right away, or after learning these important things about samdevol.com

Running with scissors

Visit samdevol.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Samdevol.com page load time and found that the first response time was 188 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

samdevol.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.1 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

samdevol.com

188 ms

samdevol.com

998 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

213 ms

style.min.css

48 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Samdevol.com, 29% (7 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (998 ms) belongs to the original domain Samdevol.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 43.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

154.0 kB

After Optimization

110.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Samdevol.com main page is 154.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 59.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 23.9 kB
  • After minification 22.4 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 24.5 kB

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 35.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Sam Devol needs image optimization as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 41% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 245 B

  • Original 38.6 kB
  • After minification 38.6 kB
  • After compression 38.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 553 B

  • Original 31.8 kB
  • After minification 31.8 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Samdevol.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (64%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sam Devol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

samdevol.com

samdevol.com

188 ms

samdevol.com

samdevol.com

998 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

213 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

48 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

54 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

60 ms

style.css

style.css

308 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

263 ms

style.css

style.css

261 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

52 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

59 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

58 ms

responsive-modernizr.min.js

responsive-modernizr.min.js

297 ms

photon.min.js

photon.min.js

57 ms

responsive-scripts.min.js

responsive-scripts.min.js

263 ms

jquery.placeholder.min.js

jquery.placeholder.min.js

443 ms

e-202419.js

e-202419.js

49 ms

style.css

style.css

218 ms

feed.png

feed.png

72 ms

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

btn_donateCC_LG.gif

43 ms

cropped-logo51.png

cropped-logo51.png

301 ms

helpbutton440.jpg

helpbutton440.jpg

290 ms

AnyDesk.jpg

AnyDesk.jpg

229 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

42 ms

Accessibility Review

samdevol.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

samdevol.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

samdevol.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Samdevol.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Samdevol.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

samdevol.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sam Devol. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: