9.3 sec in total
786 ms
8.3 sec
197 ms
Click here to check amazing Email 163 content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about email.163.com
网易免费邮箱,你的专业电子邮局,提供以@163.com、@126.com和@yeah.net为后缀的免费邮箱。超过20年邮箱运营经验,系统快速稳定安全,支持超大附件和网盘服务。网易邮箱官方App“邮箱大师”帮您高效处理邮件,支持所有邮箱,并可在手机、Windows和Mac上多端协同使用。
Visit email.163.comWe analyzed Email.163.com page load time and found that the first response time was 786 ms and then it took 8.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
email.163.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value220 ms
87/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
786 ms
910 ms
1405 ms
1681 ms
1406 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Email.163.com, 48% (20 requests) were made to Mimg.127.net and 14% (6 requests) were made to Mail.163.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Mimg.127.net.
Page size can be reduced by 26.9 kB (3%)
870.3 kB
843.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Email.163.com main page is 870.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 688.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.6 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 470 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Email 163 needs image optimization as it can save up to 470 B or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 412 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 390 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Email.163.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (51%)
35
17
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Email 163. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
email.163.com
786 ms
email.163.com
910 ms
es5-polyfill.js
1405 ms
bundle.tracing.min.js
1681 ms
message.js
1406 ms
html-polyfill.js
1422 ms
1.style.c65728d2eda26176e14d.css
1449 ms
style.57f97fa3f54499e44d06.css
1735 ms
year.js
1459 ms
mailad-sdk-0.0.19.js
1930 ms
mailscanlogin-1.2.0.js
1952 ms
email-promote.js
1720 ms
vendors~index.3882d9bae6726d7f798f.js
2329 ms
index.78eff905e724e48e222e.js
1945 ms
gonganlogo.png
277 ms
login_index.json
263 ms
getConf
1254 ms
config.do
1081 ms
form3
1385 ms
index_dl2_new.html
1300 ms
i
1528 ms
get.do
278 ms
detail
277 ms
fingerprint-2.1.2.min.js
264 ms
get.do
283 ms
urs.163.040e2854.css
519 ms
stat.gif
1155 ms
81f04801-a455-463d-a098-6e1e28d6611e
1781 ms
e06471e4-494a-43c9-b3fa-ff059ce3e0e1
1707 ms
i
242 ms
webzjconf.js
167 ms
fingerprint2.min-1.6.1.js
369 ms
preload6.htm
275 ms
pp_index_dl_9d10a0e93c13e629e99c5fb42a18350d.js
1075 ms
init
598 ms
bjs-1.1.6.js
526 ms
p0.77b0e0aa.js
1899 ms
p0.764e28f9.css
843 ms
i
242 ms
sprite_668dd9d8cbed2020ccb35961cb4f4bee.png
798 ms
ico-eye-disabled@2x.png
739 ms
icon_chk_checkbox@2x.png
739 ms
email.163.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
email.163.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
email.163.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ZH
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Email.163.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Email.163.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
email.163.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Email 163. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: