Tools & Wizards About Us
24x2.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

24x2.com

24X - SMS for Business, SMS Gateway, SMS API, SMS from Web - Worthing

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

282 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

312 ms

24x2.com screenshot

About Website

Visit 24x2.com now to see the best up-to-date 24X 2 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about 24x2.com

Easily send SMS text messages, alerts and offers to your contacts, customers and prospects in seconds. Also receive replies from SMS. Create your free account today. Low cost Bulk SMS available now!

Visit 24x2.com

Key Findings

We analyzed 24x2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

24x2.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

24x2.com

282 ms

bootstrap.min.css

347 ms

modern-business.css

179 ms

font-awesome.min.css

369 ms

Businesslady.jpg

289 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original 24x2.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to App.purechat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (857 ms) belongs to the original domain 24x2.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 224.3 kB (25%)

Content Size

910.2 kB

After Optimization

685.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of 24x2.com main page is 910.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 594.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 594.5 kB
  • After minification 592.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 24X 2 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 88.4 kB

  • Original 152.2 kB
  • After minification 152.2 kB
  • After compression 63.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.4 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 115.8 kB

  • Original 140.5 kB
  • After minification 140.0 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 24x2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 115.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (17%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 24X 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

24x2.com

24x2.com

282 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

347 ms

modern-business.css

modern-business.css

179 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

369 ms

Businesslady.jpg

Businesslady.jpg

289 ms

mantexting.jpg

mantexting.jpg

500 ms

marketing.jpg

marketing.jpg

443 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

660 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

650 ms

gotthejob.jpg

gotthejob.jpg

781 ms

texting2.jpg

texting2.jpg

857 ms

nav.html

nav.html

194 ms

WhoWeAre1.html

WhoWeAre1.html

98 ms

WhoWeAre2.html

WhoWeAre2.html

279 ms

WhoWeAre3.html

WhoWeAre3.html

180 ms

WhatWeDo1.html

WhatWeDo1.html

286 ms

WhatWeDo1a.html

WhatWeDo1a.html

380 ms

WhatWeDo2.html

WhatWeDo2.html

370 ms

WhatWeDo3.html

WhatWeDo3.html

466 ms

WhatWeDo4.html

WhatWeDo4.html

472 ms

WidgetScript

WidgetScript

23 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

25 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

69 ms

Accessibility Review

24x2.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

24x2.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

24x2.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 24x2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 24x2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

24x2.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of 24X 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: