1.7 sec in total
65 ms
1.2 sec
478 ms
Click here to check amazing 80 Grados content for Puerto Rico. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 80grados.net
por un periodismo de calidad, pensamiento y acción
Visit 80grados.netWe analyzed 80grados.net page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
80grados.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value7,280 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
65 ms
152 ms
35 ms
48 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original 80grados.net, 6% (7 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (475 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 634.7 kB (39%)
1.6 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of 80grados.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 880.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 80 Grados images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 389.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 105.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 80grados.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 105.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (56%)
105
46
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 80 Grados. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
80grados.net
65 ms
www.80grados.net
152 ms
css
35 ms
css
48 ms
css
76 ms
css
86 ms
style.css
33 ms
madmenu.css
32 ms
jquery.jcarousel.css
35 ms
skin.css
31 ms
jquery-ui.css
39 ms
disqus_rcw.css
36 ms
uaf.css
38 ms
pagenavi-css.css
42 ms
style.css
41 ms
tabbed-widgets.css
42 ms
jetpack.css
44 ms
jquery.js
55 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
49 ms
jquery.jcarousel.pack.js
58 ms
mootools-release-1.11.js
70 ms
rokbox.js
60 ms
rokbox-style.css
59 ms
rokbox-config.js
69 ms
buttons.js
30 ms
swfobject.js
41 ms
slim-081711.css
33 ms
init-plugin.js
69 ms
flexslider.css
70 ms
public.css
70 ms
core.min.js
70 ms
widget.min.js
210 ms
mouse.min.js
210 ms
resizable.min.js
213 ms
draggable.min.js
215 ms
button.min.js
215 ms
position.min.js
217 ms
dialog.min.js
259 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
70 ms
gprofiles.js
67 ms
wpgroho.js
257 ms
accordion.min.js
258 ms
jquery-cookie.min.js
259 ms
wp-embed.min.js
259 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
259 ms
e-201609.js
20 ms
ochentagrados.js
259 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
noavatar92.png
96 ms
sdk.js
475 ms
count.js
86 ms
pruebasinprisa2.png
74 ms
loupe.gif
74 ms
social_fb.png
74 ms
social_twitter.png
75 ms
Lee-Palace-1.jpg
83 ms
timthumb.php
75 ms
timthumb.php
76 ms
timthumb.php
76 ms
timthumb.php
76 ms
timthumb.php
77 ms
diag_stripe.gif
77 ms
red-30.png
78 ms
dots_content.gif
77 ms
timthumb.php
79 ms
timthumb.php
76 ms
timthumb.php
78 ms
timthumb.php
82 ms
timthumb.php
79 ms
timthumb.php
410 ms
timthumb.php
413 ms
timthumb.php
81 ms
timthumb.php
413 ms
timthumb.php
410 ms
timthumb.php
410 ms
timthumb.php
407 ms
timthumb.php
430 ms
timthumb.php
365 ms
timthumb.php
388 ms
lora1000.png
389 ms
BannerEdicionesCallejon-copy-300x0.jpg
387 ms
cpi-1170-300x0.png
389 ms
vector-LOGO-PRTQ-300x104-300x0.png
386 ms
prindie-300x0.png
416 ms
sideform.png
417 ms
footer_logo.jpg
387 ms
88x31.png
387 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xJhsE6jcpsD2oq89kgohWx0.ttf
381 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf
383 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
416 ms
ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png
124 ms
hovercard.css
139 ms
services.css
141 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
98 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
36 ms
ui-bg_glass_65_ffffff_1x400.png
37 ms
ui-icons_888888_256x240.png
37 ms
ui-icons_454545_256x240.png
63 ms
prev-vertical.png
65 ms
next-vertical.png
66 ms
onlight-accordion-closed.png
67 ms
onlight-accordion-open.png
67 ms
arrow-down.png
67 ms
g.gif
35 ms
222 ms
xd_arbiter.php
123 ms
xd_arbiter.php
249 ms
getSegment.php
175 ms
checkOAuth.esi
61 ms
t.dhj
77 ms
80grados.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
80grados.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
80grados.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 80grados.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 80grados.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
80grados.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 80 Grados. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: