Tools & Wizards About Us
acgil.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

acgil.com

Industry-specific ERP Software Development Company in India | ACGIL

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

229 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

597 ms

acgil.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ACGIL content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about acgil.com

Looking for an ERP implementation company in India? ACGIL offers industry-specific ERP software development company for manufacturing, construction, and healthcare. Get a demo.

Visit acgil.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Acgil.com page load time and found that the first response time was 229 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

acgil.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,850 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.601

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.6 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

acgil.com

229 ms

www.acgil.com

376 ms

css2

35 ms

css2

92 ms

css2

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Acgil.com, 26% (18 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 19% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (713 ms) belongs to the original domain Acgil.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Acgil.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 840.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 67.4 kB

  • Original 77.3 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.9 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 840.1 kB
  • After minification 835.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ACGIL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 32.6 kB

  • Original 390.2 kB
  • After minification 390.2 kB
  • After compression 357.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 173.3 kB
  • After minification 173.3 kB
  • After compression 170.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Acgil.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (55%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ACGIL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

acgil.com

acgil.com

229 ms

www.acgil.com

www.acgil.com

376 ms

css2

css2

35 ms

css2

css2

92 ms

css2

css2

58 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

73 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

213 ms

semantic.min.css

semantic.min.css

416 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

206 ms

variables.css

variables.css

204 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

207 ms

style.css

style.css

209 ms

js

js

63 ms

js

js

108 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

347 ms

bannermain.js

bannermain.js

272 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

346 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

277 ms

semantic.min.js

semantic.min.js

354 ms

common.js

common.js

337 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

352 ms

main.js

main.js

406 ms

cookieconsent.js

cookieconsent.js

440 ms

cookieconsent-init.js

cookieconsent-init.js

439 ms

css

css

30 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

192 ms

banner-back_dpoqea.webp

banner-back_dpoqea.webp

191 ms

cmmi3.webp

cmmi3.webp

129 ms

ISO20000-12018.webp

ISO20000-12018.webp

128 ms

ISO270012013.webp

ISO270012013.webp

189 ms

ISO90012015.webp

ISO90012015.webp

189 ms

iso18308.webp

iso18308.webp

189 ms

iso27799.webp

iso27799.webp

189 ms

iso18308-2011.jpg

iso18308-2011.jpg

510 ms

iso27799-2016.jpg

iso27799-2016.jpg

713 ms

arogyavaram-logo_qlo0qn.webp

arogyavaram-logo_qlo0qn.webp

408 ms

ayodhya-eye-hospital-logo_ehy0jr.webp

ayodhya-eye-hospital-logo_ehy0jr.webp

425 ms

shobha-nursing-home-logo_h2xa2d.webp

shobha-nursing-home-logo_h2xa2d.webp

509 ms

honeywell-logo_zp6bek.webp

honeywell-logo_zp6bek.webp

440 ms

trident-logo_hgzrj6.webp

trident-logo_hgzrj6.webp

440 ms

metlonics-logo_icotb2.webp

metlonics-logo_icotb2.webp

508 ms

viney-logo_uuvu0s.webp

viney-logo_uuvu0s.webp

434 ms

branopac-logo_m40649.webp

branopac-logo_m40649.webp

508 ms

tempco-logo_jp8udt.webp

tempco-logo_jp8udt.webp

508 ms

solution-basket-new_u70axm.webp

solution-basket-new_u70axm.webp

507 ms

features-shape_k5cemi.webp

features-shape_k5cemi.webp

506 ms

usp-img_hvraoc.webp

usp-img_hvraoc.webp

538 ms

ayodhya-eye-hospital-logo_l34unl.webp

ayodhya-eye-hospital-logo_l34unl.webp

539 ms

snh-logo_ajn6mo.webp

snh-logo_ajn6mo.webp

534 ms

Final_Logo_RM_fcej0w.webp

Final_Logo_RM_fcej0w.webp

533 ms

focos-logo_xxppip.webp

focos-logo_xxppip.webp

529 ms

aiims-logo_z9cma4.webp

aiims-logo_z9cma4.webp

532 ms

font

font

251 ms

1h2g5aumq

1h2g5aumq

289 ms

3b90158d204fdd325173a5c7873e7cc1.png

3b90158d204fdd325173a5c7873e7cc1.png

314 ms

bootstrap-icons.woff

bootstrap-icons.woff

301 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

234 ms

cookieconsent.css

cookieconsent.css

70 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

54 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

78 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

77 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

73 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

86 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

78 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

106 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

165 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

97 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

91 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

131 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

98 ms

Accessibility Review

acgil.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

acgil.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

acgil.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Acgil.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Acgil.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

acgil.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ACGIL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: