2.3 sec in total
82 ms
2.2 sec
59 ms
Welcome to arrange.studio homepage info - get ready to check Arrange best content right away, or after learning these important things about arrange.studio
We are designers in the real estate industry creating vision for beautiful living. Arrange is where interior design and marketing meet. Serving builders, realtors and small business owners with intent...
Visit arrange.studioWe analyzed Arrange.studio page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
arrange.studio performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value29.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value2,530 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value31.7 s
0/100
10%
82 ms
42 ms
39 ms
867 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Arrange.studio, 44% (30 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 32% (22 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (955 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (67%)
2.0 MB
635.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Arrange.studio main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arrange images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 184.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 42% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (24%)
41
31
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arrange. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.arrange.studio
82 ms
minified.js
42 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
39 ms
polyfill.min.js
867 ms
thunderbolt-commons.c1d8ed1c.bundle.min.js
50 ms
main.4a2d1e74.bundle.min.js
51 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
47 ms
lodash.min.js
48 ms
react.production.min.js
49 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
53 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
50 ms
161f2f_489e095676b2400bb7c7fe2cd84d9f82~mv2.gif
133 ms
Arrange%20Stamp-2.png
304 ms
11062b_6df6efba74fe4d51afeab1f732a8432cf000.png
369 ms
161f2f_9b3a3ef4714d411c8fbdf94e1363d967~mv2.png
250 ms
161f2f_459e6e9a4d0f421eb88b140dfc05b804~mv2.jpg
248 ms
161f2f_3272b4ae5c4f45b191516ff3fe5a81fa~mv2.jpg
529 ms
161f2f_3f10742df48345fe8cc4e7f85920bcef~mv2.png
450 ms
161f2f_2b178b9af7be4911883f97dec13abcb9~mv2.jpg
440 ms
PG3673159-44B2BC3A-EDCA-4CAC-9703-35BC22.jpg
482 ms
11062b_081af437c71c41d1b96ac09c6d7d0dfff000.png
407 ms
Asset%202_4x-8.png
518 ms
11062b_e55321c53b02478b9bafa28958160488f000.jpg
420 ms
zh2002294-2023%20(1)After.jpg
701 ms
161f2f_5e9b97949ab64e2b8b0402b806f385e0~mv2.png
628 ms
161f2f_60e06efd58ab493b880457dc96a0529b~mv2.png
655 ms
161f2f_aed920f5767540028d294113ee4861ff~mv2.png
697 ms
161f2f_6c3e9a1e44524b088f9363a4ab32d3a6~mv2.png
754 ms
161f2f_6042c8ccb3a34fa8be860ed51af9d2cb~mv2.png
746 ms
5bfb6f_c2ae26a3c5004bca9ea2b860a535f4ab~mv2.png
630 ms
5bfb6f_ff73ca63250240b2a3c975834afa9356~mv2.png
633 ms
161f2f_97e248062ff8412fb8c6fd300aec5dc0~mv2.webp
792 ms
161f2f_97e248062ff8412fb8c6fd300aec5dc0~mv2.webp
823 ms
161f2f_4b145076671a42cca5aa2febdc30cfca~mv2.webp
881 ms
161f2f_4b145076671a42cca5aa2febdc30cfca~mv2.webp
865 ms
161f2f_39d58eec732346fba434e1b9621075e7~mv2.webp
890 ms
161f2f_39d58eec732346fba434e1b9621075e7~mv2.webp
955 ms
09a4b57b-7400-4d30-b4ba-d6e303c57868.woff
117 ms
file.woff
664 ms
file.woff
770 ms
iEjm9hVxcattz37Y8gZwVebEnH4R5m1MLXJyCi0BC78.woff
116 ms
iEjm9hVxcattz37Y8gZwVergGQquJ_f3dxTxEJk8ZKM.woff
132 ms
PyqsDANUgLi2UsdO-d4iZQ.woff
115 ms
GwZ_PiN1Aind9Eyjp868Ez8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
116 ms
63b0b154-64e6-4846-be80-b601f3ce9b28.woff
133 ms
388ef902-2c31-4818-abb1-a40dcd81f6d6.woff
169 ms
908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff
132 ms
file.woff
795 ms
file.woff
827 ms
e2b9cbeb-fa8e-41cd-8a6a-46044b29ba52.woff
132 ms
8fb1090e-b4d0-4685-ac8f-3d0c29d60130.woff
168 ms
bundle.min.js
164 ms
130 ms
124 ms
129 ms
127 ms
122 ms
124 ms
157 ms
156 ms
154 ms
157 ms
156 ms
156 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
17 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
arrange.studio accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
arrange.studio best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
arrange.studio SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arrange.studio can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arrange.studio main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
arrange.studio
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arrange. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: