Tools & Wizards About Us
astronpack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

astronpack.com

Corrugated Box manufacturer Supplier Exporter in India, Export Good Quality High Strength Corrugated Packaging cardboard carton box, Corrugated Box Pa...

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

4.9 sec

Page Rendered

639 ms

astronpack.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Astronpack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about astronpack.com

Corrugated Box manufacturer Supplier Exporter in India, Export Good Quality High Strength Corrugated Packaging cardboard carton box, Corrugated Box Packaging Solution with virgin Kraft paper in India,...

Visit astronpack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Astronpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

astronpack.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.1 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,480 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

73/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

astronpack.com

1181 ms

www.astronpack.com

1619 ms

all.css

32 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

23 ms

animate.min.css

585 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Astronpack.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Astronpack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 623.4 kB (15%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Astronpack.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 45.2 kB

  • Original 50.9 kB
  • After minification 31.4 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.5 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 39.6 kB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Astronpack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 313.7 kB

  • Original 541.3 kB
  • After minification 506.3 kB
  • After compression 227.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.7 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 225.0 kB

  • Original 338.1 kB
  • After minification 283.6 kB
  • After compression 113.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Astronpack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 225.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (48%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Astronpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

astronpack.com

astronpack.com

1181 ms

www.astronpack.com

www.astronpack.com

1619 ms

all.css

all.css

32 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

23 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

585 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

764 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

1534 ms

style.css

style.css

959 ms

logo.png

logo.png

781 ms

slider-1.jpg

slider-1.jpg

2003 ms

slider-2.jpg

slider-2.jpg

2003 ms

slider-3.jpg

slider-3.jpg

1370 ms

slider-4.jpg

slider-4.jpg

1172 ms

slider-5.jpg

slider-5.jpg

1340 ms

slider-6.jpg

slider-6.jpg

1620 ms

slider-7.jpg

slider-7.jpg

1881 ms

slider-8.jpg

slider-8.jpg

2023 ms

slider-9.jpg

slider-9.jpg

2338 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

37 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

19 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1621 ms

easing.min.js

easing.min.js

1641 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1640 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

1641 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1648 ms

main.js

main.js

1902 ms

W331nlFvuC0

W331nlFvuC0

150 ms

corrugated.jpg

corrugated.jpg

853 ms

shelf-adhesive-label.jpg

shelf-adhesive-label.jpg

737 ms

folding-carton.jpg

folding-carton.jpg

734 ms

tackify.jpg

tackify.jpg

738 ms

trovaform.jpg

trovaform.jpg

855 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

859 ms

37ea4f5ec5cd1769ca21400bc7c48f82.woff

37ea4f5ec5cd1769ca21400bc7c48f82.woff

801 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

10 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

37 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

31 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

7 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

26 ms

base.js

base.js

52 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

180 ms

Q_BtBDv5dYOJzhRCKxAP2e8Htmv8FmyjEtTc2-mDxbE.js

Q_BtBDv5dYOJzhRCKxAP2e8Htmv8FmyjEtTc2-mDxbE.js

114 ms

embed.js

embed.js

28 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff

40 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff

45 ms

id

id

36 ms

Create

Create

118 ms

player_api

player_api

25 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

19 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

astronpack.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

astronpack.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

astronpack.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Astronpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Astronpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

astronpack.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Astronpack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: