Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

adaptiveplanning.com

Adaptive Planning EPM Software | Workday US

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

932 ms

Page Rendered

55 ms

About Website

Welcome to adaptiveplanning.com homepage info - get ready to check Adaptive Planning best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about adaptiveplanning.com

Drive enterprise-wide business planning with Workday Adaptive Planning Cloud. Our EPM platform helps organizations plan smarter, report faster, and analyze better.

Visit adaptiveplanning.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Adaptiveplanning.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 987 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

adaptiveplanning.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,540 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

adaptiveplanning.com

147 ms

overview.html

26 ms

clientlib-base.ACSHASH32553fd9edae2bdb3847cbd83406ee16.css

11 ms

app.a54ddeadbc8b802717f7.bundle.css

37 ms

responsive_image.js

448 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Adaptiveplanning.com, 67% (40 requests) were made to Workday.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Media.mktg.workday.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (448 ms) relates to the external source Media.mktg.workday.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 241.7 kB (16%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Adaptiveplanning.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 904.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 204.0 kB

  • Original 229.3 kB
  • After minification 191.4 kB
  • After compression 25.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 37.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 204.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 29.7 kB

  • Original 424.6 kB
  • After minification 394.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Adaptive Planning images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 904.6 kB
  • After minification 904.6 kB
  • After compression 896.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 150 B

  • Original 604 B
  • After minification 604 B
  • After compression 454 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Adaptiveplanning.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150 B or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (44%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Adaptive Planning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

adaptiveplanning.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

adaptiveplanning.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

adaptiveplanning.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Adaptiveplanning.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Adaptiveplanning.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Adaptive Planning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: