Access asthmacontrol.com. GSK - Service not currently available or no longer active

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

asthmacontrol.com

122 ms

asthma-control-test.html

191 ms

asthma-control-test.html

778 ms

Bootstrap.js

10 ms

ext.jquery-ui-1.10.4.min.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Asthmacontrol.com, 65% (34 requests) were made to Asthma.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Nexus.ensighten.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (778 ms) relates to the external source Asthma.com.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

424.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Asthmacontrol.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 982.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 111.4 kB

Original 134.5 kB
After minification 87.2 kB
After compression 23.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.4 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

Original 53.8 kB
After minification 46.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Asthmacontrol needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 663.4 kB

Original 982.2 kB
After minification 978.1 kB
After compression 318.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 663.4 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 173.7 kB

Original 209.8 kB
After minification 206.8 kB
After compression 36.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Asthmacontrol.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 173.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Asthmacontrol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.