Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

bornemann.net

Bornemann: GPS Live Ortung und individuelle Sicherheitslösungen | Bornemann AG

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

424 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

4 sec

About Website

Welcome to bornemann.net homepage info - get ready to check Bornemann best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about bornemann.net

Bornemann steht für moderne GPS Systeme und professionelle Sicherheitslösungen ✓ Alles aus einer Hand ✓ Hoher Datenschutz ✓ Garantie ✓ Hausfinanzierung

Visit bornemann.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Bornemann.net page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bornemann.net performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bornemann.net

424 ms

bornemann.net

588 ms

c064bf5e4d9a62e1f1bc5a67c2e833cc.css

359 ms

jquery.min.js

438 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

325 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Bornemann.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Bornemann.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.7 MB (70%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Bornemann.net main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 189.8 kB

  • Original 218.4 kB
  • After minification 189.1 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 29.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 189.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 2.5 MB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bornemann needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.5 MB or 69% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (41%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

43

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bornemann. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bornemann.net accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

bornemann.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bornemann.net SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bornemann.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bornemann.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bornemann. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: