Access electronicbox.net. Fournisseur Internet au Québec et en Ontario

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,450 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.0 s

1/100

10%

electronicbox.net

277 ms

www.ebox.ca

1125 ms

gtm.js

59 ms

style.min.css

87 ms

style.min.css

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Electronicbox.net, 84% (76 requests) were made to Ebox.ca and 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Ebox.ca.

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Electronicbox.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 890.3 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.1 MB
After compression 328.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 890.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 5.8 kB

Original 45.2 kB
After minification 39.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Electronicbox needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 965 B

Original 547.6 kB
After minification 547.6 kB
After compression 546.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

Original 141.2 kB
After minification 141.2 kB
After compression 119.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Electronicbox.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Electronicbox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.