Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

filialappeal.org

최신 토토사이트 추천 순위 TOP 11 - 온라인 스포츠 베팅 이용 가이드

Page Load Speed

608 ms in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

470 ms

Page Rendered

75 ms

About Website

Visit filialappeal.org now to see the best up-to-date Filialappeal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filialappeal.org

최신 토토사이트에 대한 추천 순위 11곳과 장단점 리뷰를 확인해 보세요! 온라인 스포츠 베팅을 이제 막 시작하는 분들께 유용한 보너스 및 결제 방법 등의 내용을 포함하고 있습니다.

Visit filialappeal.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Filialappeal.org page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 545 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filialappeal.org performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filialappeal.org

63 ms

filialappeal.org

406 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Filialappeal.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (406 ms) belongs to the original domain Filialappeal.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.6 kB (8%)

Content Size

453.1 kB

After Optimization

417.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Filialappeal.org main page is 453.1 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 362.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 22 B

  • Original 177 B
  • After minification 177 B
  • After compression 155 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22 B or 12% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 362.8 kB
  • After minification 349.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filialappeal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 41.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 27.1 kB
  • After minification 27.1 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filialappeal.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

filialappeal.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

SEO Factors

filialappeal.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    KO

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filialappeal.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Korean is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Filialappeal.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filialappeal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: