Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

vividvascular.com

Aventura North Miami Vein Doctor | Varicose Vein Treatment Kendal

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

469 ms

About Website

Welcome to vividvascular.com homepage info - get ready to check Vividvascular best content right away, or after learning these important things about vividvascular.com

Vivid Vascular provides patients with the highest quality vascular care – whether that’s through our state-of-the-art cath lab and vascular surgery suite, or staying abreast of the newest treatments a...

Visit vividvascular.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vividvascular.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vividvascular.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,940 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vividvascular.com

138 ms

vividvascular.com

395 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

75 ms

layerslider.css

149 ms

style.min.css

262 ms

Our browser made a total of 158 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (113 requests) were addressed to the original Vividvascular.com, 11% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Pixel-geo.prfct.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vividvascular.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 163.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Vividvascular.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 125.2 kB

  • Original 155.6 kB
  • After minification 150.0 kB
  • After compression 30.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 28.0 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vividvascular images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 556.3 kB
  • After minification 555.9 kB
  • After compression 552.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 229.5 kB
  • After minification 228.6 kB
  • After compression 223.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vividvascular.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 112 (85%)

Requests Now

132

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 132 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vividvascular. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 83 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vividvascular.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vividvascular.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

vividvascular.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vividvascular.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vividvascular.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vividvascular. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: