Tools & Wizards About Us
beautybatik.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

beautybatik.com

Batik Tie Dye Hippie Lagenlook Palazzo Clothing BeautyBatik.com

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

293 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

260 ms

beautybatik.com screenshot

About Website

Visit beautybatik.com now to see the best up-to-date Beauty Batik content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about beautybatik.com

BeautyBatik Online Shop Malaysia, We sell quality resort summer wear clothing. WE BELIEVE in carefree and peaceful lifestyle. Thus, we focus on bringing garments that are simple and elegant to wear. W...

Visit beautybatik.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Beautybatik.com page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

beautybatik.com performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

beautybatik.com

293 ms

calendar.css

193 ms

styles-m.css

389 ms

style-old2.css

320 ms

uppy-custom.css

321 ms

Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Beautybatik.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (389 ms) belongs to the original domain Beautybatik.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 146.4 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

887.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Beautybatik.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 518.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 62.3 kB

  • Original 72.6 kB
  • After minification 68.5 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 518.9 kB
  • After minification 518.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Beauty Batik images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 83.1 kB

  • Original 377.5 kB
  • After minification 373.5 kB
  • After compression 294.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 947 B

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 64.3 kB
  • After compression 63.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Beautybatik.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 105 (93%)

Requests Now

113

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Beauty Batik. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 101 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

beautybatik.com

beautybatik.com

293 ms

calendar.css

calendar.css

193 ms

styles-m.css

styles-m.css

389 ms

style-old2.css

style-old2.css

320 ms

uppy-custom.css

uppy-custom.css

321 ms

styles-l.css

styles-l.css

321 ms

require.js

require.js

384 ms

requirejs-config.js

requirejs-config.js

321 ms

mixins.js

mixins.js

382 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

72 ms

poncho3000x.jpg

poncho3000x.jpg

232 ms

kaftan1x1.jpg

kaftan1x1.jpg

193 ms

skirt1x1.jpg

skirt1x1.jpg

191 ms

kimono1x1.jpg

kimono1x1.jpg

254 ms

pant1x1.jpg

pant1x1.jpg

190 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

259 ms

common.js

common.js

253 ms

dataPost.js

dataPost.js

252 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

256 ms

app.js

app.js

291 ms

form-key-provider.js

form-key-provider.js

315 ms

mage-translation-dictionary.js

mage-translation-dictionary.js

314 ms

theme.js

theme.js

316 ms

opensans-400.woff

opensans-400.woff

306 ms

opensans-300.woff

opensans-300.woff

311 ms

opensans-600.woff

opensans-600.woff

342 ms

opensans-700.woff

opensans-700.woff

370 ms

Luma-Icons.woff

Luma-Icons.woff

360 ms

template.js

template.js

130 ms

confirm.js

confirm.js

131 ms

widget.js

widget.js

141 ms

domReady.js

domReady.js

165 ms

main.js

main.js

187 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

189 ms

jquery-mixin.js

jquery-mixin.js

176 ms

types.js

types.js

149 ms

layout.js

layout.js

151 ms

text.js

text.js

165 ms

smart-keyboard-handler.js

smart-keyboard-handler.js

182 ms

mage.js

mage.js

182 ms

underscore.js

underscore.js

117 ms

translate.js

translate.js

114 ms

modal.js

modal.js

121 ms

version.js

version.js

146 ms

wrapper.js

wrapper.js

125 ms

knockout.js

knockout.js

198 ms

knockout-es5.js

knockout-es5.js

125 ms

main.js

main.js

126 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

127 ms

registry.js

registry.js

157 ms

engine.js

engine.js

180 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

182 ms

observable_array.js

observable_array.js

189 ms

bound-nodes.js

bound-nodes.js

189 ms

console-logger.js

console-logger.js

218 ms

key-codes.js

key-codes.js

183 ms

core.js

core.js

185 ms

z-index.js

z-index.js

186 ms

arrays.js

arrays.js

184 ms

compare.js

compare.js

186 ms

misc.js

misc.js

186 ms

objects.js

objects.js

188 ms

strings.js

strings.js

219 ms

template.js

template.js

243 ms

knockout-repeat.js

knockout-repeat.js

186 ms

knockout-fast-foreach.js

knockout-fast-foreach.js

188 ms

observable_source.js

observable_source.js

185 ms

renderer.js

renderer.js

187 ms

resizable.js

resizable.js

218 ms

i18n.js

i18n.js

239 ms

scope.js

scope.js

245 ms

range.js

range.js

244 ms

mage-init.js

mage-init.js

244 ms

keyboard.js

keyboard.js

246 ms

optgroup.js

optgroup.js

276 ms

after-render.js

after-render.js

297 ms

events.js

events.js

302 ms

autoselect.js

autoselect.js

289 ms

datepicker.js

datepicker.js

290 ms

outer_click.js

outer_click.js

290 ms

fadeVisible.js

fadeVisible.js

321 ms

collapsible.js

collapsible.js

343 ms

staticChecked.js

staticChecked.js

348 ms

simple-checked.js

simple-checked.js

348 ms

bind-html.js

bind-html.js

349 ms

tooltip.js

tooltip.js

350 ms

color-picker.js

color-picker.js

379 ms

local.js

local.js

381 ms

logger.js

logger.js

384 ms

entry-factory.js

entry-factory.js

382 ms

console-output-handler.js

console-output-handler.js

383 ms

formatter.js

formatter.js

384 ms

message-pool.js

message-pool.js

382 ms

levels-pool.js

levels-pool.js

382 ms

logger-utils.js

logger-utils.js

383 ms

data.js

data.js

383 ms

disable-selection.js

disable-selection.js

384 ms

focusable.js

focusable.js

382 ms

form.js

form.js

380 ms

ie.js

ie.js

378 ms

keycode.js

keycode.js

383 ms

labels.js

labels.js

383 ms

jquery-patch.js

jquery-patch.js

383 ms

plugin.js

plugin.js

382 ms

safe-active-element.js

safe-active-element.js

380 ms

safe-blur.js

safe-blur.js

382 ms

scroll-parent.js

scroll-parent.js

383 ms

tabbable.js

tabbable.js

383 ms

unique-id.js

unique-id.js

383 ms

class.js

class.js

382 ms

loader.js

loader.js

381 ms

async.js

async.js

383 ms

spectrum.js

spectrum.js

289 ms

tinycolor.js

tinycolor.js

286 ms

moment.js

moment.js

256 ms

entry.js

entry.js

283 ms

dom-observer.js

dom-observer.js

65 ms

bindings.js

bindings.js

65 ms

print.css

print.css

65 ms

Accessibility Review

beautybatik.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

beautybatik.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

beautybatik.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Beautybatik.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Beautybatik.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

beautybatik.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Beauty Batik. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: