5.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
4.1 sec
459 ms
Welcome to bmtoolbox.net homepage info - get ready to check Bm Toolbox best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about bmtoolbox.net
We drive you towards BETTER Business Model Innovation. Get inspired by different tools, interesting stories and business model patterns.
Visit bmtoolbox.netWe analyzed Bmtoolbox.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
bmtoolbox.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.3 s
0/100
10%
Value22.6 s
0/100
25%
Value23.1 s
0/100
10%
Value9,420 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.081
94/100
15%
Value32.0 s
0/100
10%
1286 ms
41 ms
72 ms
287 ms
270 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Bmtoolbox.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Bmtoolbox.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (76%)
2.2 MB
529.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Bmtoolbox.net main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Bm Toolbox needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 328.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 328.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Bmtoolbox.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (83%)
54
9
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bm Toolbox. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
bmtoolbox.net
1286 ms
font-awesome.min.css
41 ms
adsbygoogle.js
72 ms
iubenda_cs.js
287 ms
analytics.js
270 ms
show_ads_impl.js
183 ms
zrt_lookup.html
353 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
298 ms
style.min.css
477 ms
styles.css
475 ms
settings.css
583 ms
css
99 ms
css
294 ms
css
295 ms
fontello.css
528 ms
formcraft-common.css
601 ms
form.css
685 ms
wpctc.min.css
556 ms
style.css
570 ms
style.dev.css
1088 ms
style.css
834 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
675 ms
magnific_popup.css
676 ms
dashicons.min.css
798 ms
jquery.min.js
865 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
770 ms
et-core-unified-74-16630630922656.min.css
776 ms
css
306 ms
style-min.css
864 ms
style.css
967 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
899 ms
jquery.tagcanvas.min.js
1023 ms
wpctc.tagcanvas.min.js
964 ms
jquery.style.min.js
964 ms
wp-category-tag-cloud.min.js
995 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
1053 ms
custom.js
1470 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1058 ms
waypoints.min.js
1468 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1468 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
1471 ms
common.js
1468 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1469 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
1469 ms
custom.js
1469 ms
idle-timer.min.js
1469 ms
core-en.js
56 ms
collect
221 ms
logo_farbe_definiert_160324.png
115 ms
bmt_welcome_160912.png
106 ms
30Euro_Astronaut_Inspirationbox_160912.png
108 ms
slider_canvas_160324.png
107 ms
opensans-regular.woff
433 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
104 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
104 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
410 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
494 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
493 ms
modules.ttf
425 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
94 ms
cookie.js
477 ms
integrator.js
464 ms
collect
343 ms
fontello.woff
354 ms
bmtoolbox.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
bmtoolbox.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
bmtoolbox.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bmtoolbox.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bmtoolbox.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
bmtoolbox.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Bm Toolbox. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: