2.8 sec in total
277 ms
2.2 sec
314 ms
Click here to check amazing Web Browsers Best Compare S content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about web-browsers.bestcompares.com
Find and compare the best Web Browsers, as defined by the experts.Which Web Browsers is the right for you. Compare features and Overall Performance Rankings,Browser Name,Developer,Open Source,Download...
Visit web-browsers.bestcompares.comWe analyzed Web-browsers.bestcompares.com page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
web-browsers.bestcompares.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value900 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
277 ms
283 ms
300 ms
609 ms
512 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Web-browsers.bestcompares.com, 46% (23 requests) were made to Bestcompares.com and 20% (10 requests) were made to Img.bestcompares.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (945 ms) relates to the external source Img.bestcompares.com.
Page size can be reduced by 108.1 kB (19%)
569.1 kB
461.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Web-browsers.bestcompares.com main page is 569.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 254.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Browsers Best Compare S images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 44.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 44.8 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 859 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Web-browsers.bestcompares.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (28%)
47
34
The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Browsers Best Compare S. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
web-browsers.bestcompares.com
277 ms
jquery.dataTables.css
283 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
300 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
609 ms
jquery.dataTables.delay.min.js
512 ms
jquery-ui.css
41 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js
314 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.css
292 ms
style.css
314 ms
script.js
224 ms
fixedheader.js
230 ms
adsbygoogle.js
39 ms
getcountry.php
350 ms
32.gif
266 ms
topBg.png
58 ms
logo.png
58 ms
searchBg.png
54 ms
searchBtnTrans.gif
58 ms
brows.png
55 ms
browshover.png
267 ms
bread.jpg
59 ms
right_arrow.png
265 ms
left_arrow.png
266 ms
zrt_lookup.html
43 ms
show_ads_impl.js
117 ms
color-sprite25.png
28 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
247 ms
cal_img.png
247 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
table_data.php
132 ms
show_hide_filter.php
223 ms
sprites.png
261 ms
cookie.js
118 ms
integrator.js
126 ms
ads
216 ms
collect
113 ms
ads
196 ms
2301-1-lunascape-web_browsers.jpg
419 ms
2098-1-omniweb-web_browsers.jpg
724 ms
1804-1-lynx-web_browsers.PNG
770 ms
1890-1-links-web_browsers.jpg
645 ms
2112-1-maxthon-web_browsers.jpg
784 ms
1989-1-midori-web_browsers.jpg
662 ms
2120-1-netsurf-web_browsers.jpg
851 ms
2196-1-netscape-web_browsers.jpg
873 ms
1975-1-galeon-web_browsers.jpg
893 ms
2302-1-comitbird-web_browsers.jpg
945 ms
ads
189 ms
www.bestcompares.com
269 ms
www.bestcompares.com
274 ms
web-browsers.bestcompares.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
web-browsers.bestcompares.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
web-browsers.bestcompares.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Web-browsers.bestcompares.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Web-browsers.bestcompares.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
web-browsers.bestcompares.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Browsers Best Compare S. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: