Tools & Wizards About Us
call4site.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

call4site.com

Call4site.com | Website Design, Software and Mobile Development at Kolkata, Jamshedpur

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

635 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

575 ms

call4site.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to call4site.com homepage info - get ready to check Call4site best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about call4site.com

First impression decides everything. So why stick to a badly designed website? Simply contact us to get world-class, professionally designed website as per your needs.

Visit call4site.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Call4site.com page load time and found that the first response time was 635 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

call4site.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

call4site.com

635 ms

call4site.com

1063 ms

font-awesome.css

416 ms

bootstrap.css

1412 ms

style.css

1213 ms

Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Call4site.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Call4site.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 798.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

9.2 MB

After Optimization

8.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Call4site.com main page is 9.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 46.1 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.4 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 65.7 kB

  • Original 8.3 MB
  • After minification 8.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Call4site images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 216.3 kB

  • Original 277.4 kB
  • After minification 214.2 kB
  • After compression 61.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 216.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 474.8 kB

  • Original 564.1 kB
  • After minification 497.3 kB
  • After compression 89.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Call4site.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 474.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (28%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

60

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Call4site. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

call4site.com

call4site.com

635 ms

call4site.com

call4site.com

1063 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

416 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

1412 ms

style.css

style.css

1213 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

818 ms

gallery.css

gallery.css

620 ms

style-home.db0201b0.min.css

style-home.db0201b0.min.css

1457 ms

us.svg

us.svg

629 ms

in.svg

in.svg

827 ms

logo.png

logo.png

841 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

2042 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

3107 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

3347 ms

icon1.png

icon1.png

1416 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

1612 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

1616 ms

icon4.png

icon4.png

1459 ms

icon5.png

icon5.png

1610 ms

icon55.png

icon55.png

1614 ms

icon6.png

icon6.png

1667 ms

icon66.png

icon66.png

1811 ms

icon8.png

icon8.png

1816 ms

icon88.png

icon88.png

1876 ms

icon7.png

icon7.png

2012 ms

icon77.png

icon77.png

2017 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

8 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

2039 ms

gallery.flexisel.js

gallery.flexisel.js

2081 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

2412 ms

slick.js

slick.js

2419 ms

main.js

main.js

2242 ms

custom.js

custom.js

2290 ms

icon9.png

icon9.png

2445 ms

icon10.png

icon10.png

2498 ms

icon11.png

icon11.png

2614 ms

icon12.png

icon12.png

2621 ms

icon13.png

icon13.png

2650 ms

perspective-project1.png

perspective-project1.png

2920 ms

css

css

32 ms

css

css

49 ms

css

css

53 ms

css

css

55 ms

font.css

font.css

2610 ms

logo-project-1.png

logo-project-1.png

2616 ms

perspective-project2.png

perspective-project2.png

2475 ms

logo-project-2.png

logo-project-2.png

2410 ms

perspective-project3.png

perspective-project3.png

2442 ms

logo-project-3.png

logo-project-3.png

2459 ms

css

css

20 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

23 ms

css

css

24 ms

perspective-project4.png

perspective-project4.png

2121 ms

logo-project-4.png

logo-project-4.png

2012 ms

perspective-project5.png

perspective-project5.png

2022 ms

css

css

18 ms

css

css

19 ms

logo-project-5.png

logo-project-5.png

2009 ms

perspective-project6.png

perspective-project6.png

2305 ms

logo-project-6.png

logo-project-6.png

1929 ms

client1.png

client1.png

2101 ms

client2.png

client2.png

2018 ms

client3.png

client3.png

1828 ms

client4.png

client4.png

1808 ms

client5.png

client5.png

1739 ms

client6.png

client6.png

1830 ms

client7.png

client7.png

1843 ms

client8.png

client8.png

1884 ms

client9.png

client9.png

1756 ms

client10.png

client10.png

2013 ms

client11.png

client11.png

1809 ms

about-bg.jpg

about-bg.jpg

1046 ms

img.jpg

img.jpg

1287 ms

mockup-bg.jpg

mockup-bg.jpg

1128 ms

spec-bg.jpg

spec-bg.jpg

1143 ms

bg-project-1.jpg

bg-project-1.jpg

1216 ms

bg-project-2.jpg

bg-project-2.jpg

1250 ms

bg-project-2.jpg

bg-project-2.jpg

1338 ms

bg-project-3.jpg

bg-project-3.jpg

1359 ms

bg-project-4.jpg

bg-project-4.jpg

1592 ms

bg-project-5.jpg

bg-project-5.jpg

1629 ms

bg-project-6.jpg

bg-project-6.jpg

1401 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

17 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

32 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

38 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

38 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

54 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1435 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf

53 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf

38 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf

37 ms

prev1.png

prev1.png

210 ms

next1.png

next1.png

205 ms

Accessibility Review

call4site.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

call4site.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

call4site.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Call4site.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Call4site.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

call4site.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Call4site. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: