Tools & Wizards About Us
careclinic.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

careclinic.io

Wellness Tracker | App for Patients, Caregivers, Health Enthusiasts

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

65 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

753 ms

careclinic.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Careclinic content for Singapore. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about careclinic.io

Manage medication, and symptom reminders using the CareClinic Pill Tracker App. Rated the best medicine management app to improve outcomes.

Visit careclinic.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Careclinic.io page load time and found that the first response time was 65 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

careclinic.io performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,110 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

careclinic.io

65 ms

style.min.css

16 ms

text-only.min.css

37 ms

cool-tag-cloud.css

44 ms

screen.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Careclinic.io, 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) belongs to the original domain Careclinic.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.8 kB (11%)

Content Size

460.2 kB

After Optimization

407.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Careclinic.io main page is 460.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 224.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 58.3 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 224.7 kB
  • After minification 217.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Careclinic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 639 B

  • Original 92.8 kB
  • After minification 92.8 kB
  • After compression 92.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 49 B

  • Original 84.4 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB
  • After compression 84.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Careclinic.io has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (69%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Careclinic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

careclinic.io

careclinic.io

65 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

16 ms

text-only.min.css

text-only.min.css

37 ms

cool-tag-cloud.css

cool-tag-cloud.css

44 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

27 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

37 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

60 ms

style.css

style.css

28 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

45 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

43 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

46 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

49 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

46 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

53 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

46 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

54 ms

jquery.knob.js

jquery.knob.js

54 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

95 ms

scrollReveal.js

scrollReveal.js

96 ms

zerif.js

zerif.js

97 ms

rocket-loader.min.js

rocket-loader.min.js

54 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

42 ms

app-user-cc.jpg

app-user-cc.jpg

37 ms

css

css

37 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

22 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

34 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

35 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

70 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

101 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

115 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

90 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

99 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

127 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

376 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

377 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

19 ms

js

js

91 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

167 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

163 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

87 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

166 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

160 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

35 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

36 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

36 ms

cropped-cc-logo.png

cropped-cc-logo.png

98 ms

stars.png

stars.png

246 ms

142578499414694

142578499414694

196 ms

jquery.knob.js

jquery.knob.js

150 ms

collect

collect

161 ms

show_ads_impl_fy2021.js

show_ads_impl_fy2021.js

126 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

120 ms

collect

collect

67 ms

js

js

60 ms

collect

collect

107 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

47 ms

collect

collect

72 ms

scrollReveal.js

scrollReveal.js

25 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

75 ms

app-store-badge.png

app-store-badge.png

105 ms

google-play-badge.png

google-play-badge.png

103 ms

CareClinic-qrcode.png

CareClinic-qrcode.png

96 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

62 ms

zerif.js

zerif.js

11 ms

18 ms

16 ms

Accessibility Review

careclinic.io accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

careclinic.io best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

careclinic.io SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Careclinic.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Careclinic.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

careclinic.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Careclinic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: