Tools & Wizards About Us
castlewoodfence.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

castlewoodfence.com

Fence Contractor | Parker Colorado | Castlewood Fence

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

121 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

89 ms

castlewoodfence.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to castlewoodfence.com homepage info - get ready to check Castlewood Fence best content right away, or after learning these important things about castlewoodfence.com

Colorado's Most Reliable Fence Contractor | Get A Free Quote & See What Makes Us Different | Castlewood Fence

Visit castlewoodfence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Castlewoodfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 121 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

castlewoodfence.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,510 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.castlewoodfence.com

121 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

38 ms

minified.js

48 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

44 ms

polyfill.min.js

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Castlewoodfence.com, 44% (21 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 25% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (725 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 831.0 kB (54%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

713.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Castlewoodfence.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 962.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 776.5 kB

  • Original 962.7 kB
  • After minification 961.2 kB
  • After compression 186.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 776.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 51.7 kB

  • Original 357.2 kB
  • After minification 305.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Castlewood Fence needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 224.4 kB
  • After minification 224.4 kB
  • After compression 221.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (41%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Castlewood Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.castlewoodfence.com

www.castlewoodfence.com

121 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

38 ms

minified.js

minified.js

48 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

44 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

126 ms

thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.ec68bee9.bundle.min.js

20 ms

main.f286c407.bundle.min.js

main.f286c407.bundle.min.js

76 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

22 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

22 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

78 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

76 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

78 ms

Castlewood%20Fence%20Logo%20One-Color%20Square_p.png

Castlewood%20Fence%20Logo%20One-Color%20Square_p.png

499 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

287 ms

4dd02d_e757c1a1bc3f480b9518c2ebf14192d6~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

4dd02d_e757c1a1bc3f480b9518c2ebf14192d6~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

381 ms

4dd02d_254297e60fb848348bae287d6c99df34~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

4dd02d_254297e60fb848348bae287d6c99df34~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

425 ms

4dd02d_5654b9e05ca246c49d3033227490a2d5~mv2_d_1498_1414_s_2.png

4dd02d_5654b9e05ca246c49d3033227490a2d5~mv2_d_1498_1414_s_2.png

442 ms

4dd02d_12db7a20cf3a4a2fb23badd70b8635b8~mv2_d_1364_1312_s_2.png

4dd02d_12db7a20cf3a4a2fb23badd70b8635b8~mv2_d_1364_1312_s_2.png

432 ms

4dd02d_caaaa1685bd141fea318153dd4a99653~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

4dd02d_caaaa1685bd141fea318153dd4a99653~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

456 ms

4dd02d_a024540a5e2e43ddab035b0a91097467~mv2_d_3264_2448_s_4_2.jpg

4dd02d_a024540a5e2e43ddab035b0a91097467~mv2_d_3264_2448_s_4_2.jpg

725 ms

4dd02d_38d2f5f1beba4ba0b25c224695bf2d05~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

4dd02d_38d2f5f1beba4ba0b25c224695bf2d05~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

655 ms

90032cdb489d445d883826c0b36f3c52.jpg

90032cdb489d445d883826c0b36f3c52.jpg

425 ms

4dd02d_f3f08dcc10de40539e587fa795c99c6b~mv2_d_1200_1600_s_2.jpg

4dd02d_f3f08dcc10de40539e587fa795c99c6b~mv2_d_1200_1600_s_2.jpg

709 ms

4dd02d_89269f66a8dc46dbb333425d28731cc4~mv2.png

4dd02d_89269f66a8dc46dbb333425d28731cc4~mv2.png

714 ms

f70c24b0-d6be-4d04-99cd-46efc41d00b4.woff

f70c24b0-d6be-4d04-99cd-46efc41d00b4.woff

34 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

35 ms

9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff

9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff

15 ms

80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff

80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff

33 ms

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff

33 ms

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff

32 ms

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff

33 ms

b36b499f-d776-461c-bacb-fcbebe1cb9b4.woff

b36b499f-d776-461c-bacb-fcbebe1cb9b4.woff

34 ms

46 ms

9 ms

13 ms

11 ms

12 ms

14 ms

58 ms

57 ms

56 ms

57 ms

66 ms

97 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

11 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

28 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

3 ms

Accessibility Review

castlewoodfence.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

castlewoodfence.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

castlewoodfence.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Castlewoodfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Castlewoodfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

castlewoodfence.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Castlewood Fence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: