Tools & Wizards About Us
castlewoodfence.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

castlewoodfence.com

Fence Contractor | Parker Colorado | Castlewood Fence

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

castlewoodfence.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to castlewoodfence.com homepage info - get ready to check Castlewood Fence best content right away, or after learning these important things about castlewoodfence.com

Colorado's Most Reliable Fence Contractor | Get A Free Quote & See What Makes Us Different | Castlewood Fence

Visit castlewoodfence.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Castlewoodfence.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

castlewoodfence.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,680 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.castlewoodfence.com

136 ms

minified.js

46 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

44 ms

polyfill.min.js

698 ms

thunderbolt-commons.dae61f88.bundle.min.js

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Castlewoodfence.com, 32% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (13 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (738 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 760.0 kB (51%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

737.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Castlewoodfence.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 872.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 702.4 kB

  • Original 872.4 kB
  • After minification 870.8 kB
  • After compression 170.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 702.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 53.3 kB

  • Original 362.4 kB
  • After minification 309.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Castlewood Fence needs image optimization as it can save up to 53.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 262.9 kB
  • After minification 262.9 kB
  • After compression 258.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (41%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Castlewood Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.castlewoodfence.com

www.castlewoodfence.com

136 ms

minified.js

minified.js

46 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

44 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

698 ms

thunderbolt-commons.dae61f88.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.dae61f88.bundle.min.js

64 ms

main.de20c391.bundle.min.js

main.de20c391.bundle.min.js

65 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

25 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

62 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

63 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

63 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

61 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

63 ms

Castlewood%20Fence%20Logo%20One-Color%20Square_p.png

Castlewood%20Fence%20Logo%20One-Color%20Square_p.png

395 ms

4dd02d_e757c1a1bc3f480b9518c2ebf14192d6~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

4dd02d_e757c1a1bc3f480b9518c2ebf14192d6~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

416 ms

4dd02d_254297e60fb848348bae287d6c99df34~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

4dd02d_254297e60fb848348bae287d6c99df34~mv2_d_4032_3024_s_4_2.jpg

528 ms

4dd02d_5654b9e05ca246c49d3033227490a2d5~mv2_d_1498_1414_s_2.png

4dd02d_5654b9e05ca246c49d3033227490a2d5~mv2_d_1498_1414_s_2.png

529 ms

4dd02d_12db7a20cf3a4a2fb23badd70b8635b8~mv2_d_1364_1312_s_2.png

4dd02d_12db7a20cf3a4a2fb23badd70b8635b8~mv2_d_1364_1312_s_2.png

456 ms

4dd02d_caaaa1685bd141fea318153dd4a99653~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

4dd02d_caaaa1685bd141fea318153dd4a99653~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

428 ms

4dd02d_a024540a5e2e43ddab035b0a91097467~mv2_d_3264_2448_s_4_2.jpg

4dd02d_a024540a5e2e43ddab035b0a91097467~mv2_d_3264_2448_s_4_2.jpg

703 ms

4dd02d_38d2f5f1beba4ba0b25c224695bf2d05~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

4dd02d_38d2f5f1beba4ba0b25c224695bf2d05~mv2_d_2048_1536_s_2.jpg

706 ms

90032cdb489d445d883826c0b36f3c52.jpg

90032cdb489d445d883826c0b36f3c52.jpg

429 ms

4dd02d_f3f08dcc10de40539e587fa795c99c6b~mv2_d_1200_1600_s_2.jpg

4dd02d_f3f08dcc10de40539e587fa795c99c6b~mv2_d_1200_1600_s_2.jpg

738 ms

4dd02d_89269f66a8dc46dbb333425d28731cc4~mv2.webp

4dd02d_89269f66a8dc46dbb333425d28731cc4~mv2.webp

688 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

73 ms

121 ms

114 ms

110 ms

107 ms

108 ms

109 ms

157 ms

152 ms

150 ms

147 ms

150 ms

150 ms

189 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

20 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

castlewoodfence.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

castlewoodfence.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

castlewoodfence.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Castlewoodfence.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Castlewoodfence.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

castlewoodfence.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Castlewood Fence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: