6.2 sec in total
88 ms
5.6 sec
484 ms
Click here to check amazing Check Point Cioreview content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about check-point.cioreview.com
Network Security, Endpoint Security, Software Blades, Managed IPS, Appliances, Security Management, Carrier Security
Visit check-point.cioreview.comWe analyzed Check-point.cioreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
check-point.cioreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value9.4 s
1/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value3,220 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.288
42/100
15%
Value23.8 s
1/100
10%
88 ms
700 ms
803 ms
1340 ms
1132 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Check-point.cioreview.com, 29% (33 requests) were made to Cioreview.com and 17% (19 requests) were made to Magazine.cioreview.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Magazine.cioreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 547.9 kB (34%)
1.6 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Check-point.cioreview.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 847.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 182.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 96.2 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 182.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Check Point Cioreview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 158.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.5 kB or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Check-point.cioreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 133.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (61%)
103
40
The browser has sent 103 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Check Point Cioreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
check-point.cioreview.com
88 ms
check-point.cioreview.com
700 ms
gpt.js
803 ms
atrk.js
1340 ms
jquery.min.js
1132 ms
javascript_version1.js
1051 ms
javascript_version2_ads.js
1051 ms
searchtracker.js
180 ms
js
1542 ms
outer_cio.css
667 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1072 ms
ionicons.min.css
1328 ms
master.css
790 ms
qaforff_new.css
940 ms
all_in_one.css
1072 ms
ddm8_v10_new.css
1041 ms
css
1323 ms
header_part_css_new.css
1071 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1556 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1120 ms
search.js
1579 ms
flexslider_new.css
736 ms
adsbygoogle.js
1508 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
1507 ms
right_part_new.css
1479 ms
css
1575 ms
flexslider.css
944 ms
bjqs-1.3.min.js
1575 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
943 ms
js&f=jquery.js,easing.min.js,1.8.2.min.js,carouFredSel.js,superfish.js,customM.js,flexslider-min.js,jtwt.min.js,jflickrfeed.min.js
1547 ms
vendorlist_balance2.js
1451 ms
ui_new.js
1450 ms
carouFredSel_new.js
1242 ms
superfish_new.js
1036 ms
customM_new.js
1037 ms
flexslider-min_new.js
1448 ms
jtwt.min_new.js
1448 ms
jflickrfeed.min.js
1472 ms
mobilemenu.js
1475 ms
mypassion3.js
1471 ms
ddmjs1.js
2487 ms
ddmjs3_new.js
2476 ms
ddmjs4_new.js
2477 ms
slider-menu.js
2484 ms
pubads_impl_2022092701.js
597 ms
ppub_config
1623 ms
styles.css
1450 ms
gpt.js
1614 ms
savetracknew.php
1347 ms
gtm.js
1337 ms
analytics.js
1582 ms
line.png
1163 ms
tw1side.png
1144 ms
li1side.png
1153 ms
fb32.gif
1152 ms
cr-logo.png
1154 ms
Banner-CIOReview%20-%20Wireless.jpg
1155 ms
540x370_3Dni.jpg
1154 ms
101x69_VIm31d97.jpg
1157 ms
101x69_dqFn.jpg
1157 ms
101x69_QG6u.jpg
1157 ms
101x69_B4E3.jpg
1168 ms
101x69_QRs9G4KL.jpg
1167 ms
280x192_6dZ9.jpg
1167 ms
280x192_8kLb.jpg
1318 ms
540x370_g1QL.jpg
1318 ms
280x192_S2Xz.jpg
1318 ms
280x192_v5280l49.jpg
1317 ms
540x370_fF1Qq9si.jpg
1317 ms
280x192_ugoO.jpg
1318 ms
280x192_Rqx2.jpg
1384 ms
280x192_24YP.jpg
1385 ms
280x192_1T62f8hF.jpg
1333 ms
280x192_8mM9.jpg
1384 ms
280x192_UiRH53hl.jpg
1331 ms
280x192_nZft.jpg
1383 ms
gmk6l.CheckPointcover300.jpg
1591 ms
0tw1.jpg
1588 ms
0lnk2.jpg
1589 ms
x.png
1589 ms
atrk.gif
1340 ms
css
193 ms
res-menu-icon.jpg
260 ms
integrator.js
236 ms
ads
479 ms
container.html
165 ms
js
92 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
74 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
80 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
77 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
75 ms
767_new.css
87 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
108 ms
collect
116 ms
collect
72 ms
zrt_lookup.html
201 ms
collect
220 ms
collect
230 ms
9824889601953554455
256 ms
icon.png
31 ms
abg_lite.js
255 ms
window_focus.js
568 ms
rx_lidar.js
41 ms
widgets.js
558 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
224 ms
ga-audiences
535 ms
ga-audiences
524 ms
all.js
412 ms
icon.png
191 ms
5093529683752639533
320 ms
pixel.png
6 ms
all.js
373 ms
widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html
152 ms
check-point.cioreview.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
check-point.cioreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
check-point.cioreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Check-point.cioreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Check-point.cioreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
check-point.cioreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Check Point Cioreview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: