2.8 sec in total
379 ms
2.1 sec
272 ms
Welcome to chipkin.com homepage info - get ready to check Chipkin best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about chipkin.com
Chipkin empowers efficiency and control with innovative building automation solutions. Explore our products today!
Visit chipkin.comWe analyzed Chipkin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
chipkin.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value2,720 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
379 ms
75 ms
133 ms
202 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Chipkin.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to Google.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (647 ms) belongs to the original domain Chipkin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 866.1 kB (57%)
1.5 MB
656.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Chipkin.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 727.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 67.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 96.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Chipkin needs image optimization as it can save up to 96.5 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 468.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 468.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 233.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Chipkin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (63%)
71
26
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Chipkin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.chipkin.com
379 ms
style.css
75 ms
tab-styles.css
133 ms
bootstrap-combined.min.css
202 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
bootstrap.min.js
132 ms
styles.css
136 ms
basic.css
136 ms
skin.css
141 ms
jquery.js
272 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
199 ms
hoverIntent.js
254 ms
ubermenu.min.js
248 ms
jquery.form.min.js
250 ms
scripts.js
263 ms
qppr_frontend_script.js
263 ms
widget.js
282 ms
urchin.js
20 ms
css
25 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
100 ms
gplus-32.png
65 ms
logo.gif
94 ms
350790480.png
93 ms
GATEWAYS-BOX.png
460 ms
innovonics-product1.png
231 ms
SALE-BLOCK1.png
231 ms
Purple-Bacnet.png
146 ms
purple-products.png
421 ms
BACnet-Internatl-member-of-logo-300x76.jpg
638 ms
QuickServer-208x300.jpg
230 ms
DSC_3157_350-300x198.jpg
299 ms
s4_objectengine-300x154.gif
440 ms
SMC_logo_blue_large-300x143.png
438 ms
Protocessor_hone.png
647 ms
item_fp.png
500 ms
platform.js
116 ms
cse.js
55 ms
livechat-new.js
34 ms
__utm.gif
29 ms
ga.js
56 ms
cse.js
130 ms
ajax-loader.gif
429 ms
livechat-cloud-new.js
73 ms
__utm.gif
42 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
31 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
53 ms
fastbutton
95 ms
livechat-v2.js
26 ms
preferences
280 ms
jsapi
77 ms
postmessageRelay
68 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
53 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
53 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
148 ms
api.js
37 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
135 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
115 ms
default+en.css
24 ms
default.css
39 ms
default+en.I.js
38 ms
default.css
58 ms
async-ads.js
112 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
79 ms
small-logo.png
50 ms
search_box_icon.png
49 ms
clear.gif
50 ms
nav_logo114.png
51 ms
ajax-loader-cursor.gif
174 ms
social_ui_big.js.min.js
25 ms
warning.png
178 ms
241b3b-medium.css
97 ms
clickdesklogo.png
124 ms
proactive
183 ms
popup-3d.png
21 ms
social-sprite-fields.png
13 ms
chipkin.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
chipkin.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
chipkin.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Chipkin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Chipkin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
chipkin.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Chipkin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: